From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] of: partition: support of_partition_ensure_probed on parent device
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 06:48:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0166cc41-dd9b-728c-a478-85bb8ec5b196@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531163056.tcjwizntvsrbekm6@pengutronix.de>
Hello Marco,
On 31.05.23 18:30, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Ahmad,
>
> On 23-05-31, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> barebox-state code uses of_partition_ensure_probed to resolve the
>> backend property. We want to allow backend to point directly at a
>> storage device instead of a partition. We can't determine whether a DT
>> device is a storage device though before it's probed, so let's have
>> of_partition_ensure_probed support either case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/partition.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/of/platform.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/partition.c b/drivers/of/partition.c
>> index 40c47f554ad2..a70e503cec9e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/partition.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/partition.c
>> @@ -110,14 +110,32 @@ int of_parse_partitions(struct cdev *cdev, struct device_node *node)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * of_partition_ensure_probed - ensure a parition is probed
>> + * @np: pointer to a partition or to a partitionable device
>> + * Unfortunately, there is no completely reliable way
>> + * to differentiate partitions from devices prior to
>> + * probing, because partitions may also have compatibles.
>> + * We only handle nvmem-cells, so anything besides that
>> + * is assumed to be a device that should be probed directly.
>> + *
>> + * Returns zero on success or a negative error code otherwise
>> + */
>> int of_partition_ensure_probed(struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> - np = of_get_parent(np);
>> + struct device_node *parent = of_get_parent(np);
>>
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "fixed-partitions"))
>> - np = of_get_parent(np);
>> + if (parent && of_device_is_compatible(parent, "fixed-partitions"))
>
> When is the parent not present? This should only be the case when 'np'
> points to the root_node. So in case of !parent I would return -EINVAL
> early.
will do.
>
>> + return of_device_ensure_probed(of_get_parent(np));
> ^
> parent?
Yes, You're right.
> Not related to this patch but the logic would become easier if would
> have devices for each mtd-part, like the kernel does. In such case we
> could avoid these special handlings and just use
> of_device_ensure_probed() at least for the mtd-parts, nvmem-cells still
> need a special handling.
How you mean? of_partition_ensure_probed can be called before there can
be any devices at all.
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
>> - return np ? of_device_ensure_probed(np) : -EINVAL;
>> + if (of_get_compatible_child(np, "fixed-partitions"))
>> + return of_device_ensure_probed(np);
I think this can be dropped, so the case falls through to the final
of_device_ensure_probed.
>> +
>> + if (!of_property_present(np, "compatible") ||
>> + of_device_is_compatible(np, "nvmem-cells"))
>> + return of_device_ensure_probed(parent);
>> +
>> + return of_device_ensure_probed(np);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_partition_ensure_probed);
Thanks,
Ahmad
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> index ab737629325a..78b8a31331db 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ int of_device_ensure_probed(struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> struct device *dev;
>>
>> - if (!deep_probe_is_supported())
>> + if (!np || !deep_probe_is_supported())
>> return 0;
>>
>> dev = of_device_create_on_demand(np);
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-31 14:59 [PATCH 00/18] state: allow lookup of barebox state partition by Type GUID Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 01/18] common: partitions: decouple from EFI GUID definition Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 02/18] efi: define efi_guid_t as 32-bit aligned guid_t Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 03/18] cdev: fix for_each_cdev macro Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 15:37 ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 04/18] of: partition: support of_partition_ensure_probed on parent device Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:30 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 4:48 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 05/18] of: of_path: always call of_partition_ensure_probed before resolving Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:34 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 7:00 ` Ulrich Ölmann
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 06/18] driver: add new cdev_is_partition helper Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:36 ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 07/18] commands: stat: remove code duplication for type info Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:44 ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 08/18] cdev: use more descriptive struct cdev::diskuuid/partuuid Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 16:56 ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 09/18] cdev: record whether partition is parsed from OF Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:04 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-06 19:31 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01 8:03 ` Ulrich Ölmann
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 10/18] cdev: have devfs_add_partition return existing identical partition, not NULL Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:23 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 4:56 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01 7:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-06-01 8:26 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 7:36 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-06-07 8:06 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 11/18] block: parse partition table on block device registration Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:25 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 7:42 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-06-01 8:33 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-06 19:30 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01 8:24 ` Ulrich Ölmann
2023-06-01 8:31 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01 10:33 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 12/18] common: partitions: record whether disk is GPT or MBR partitioned Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:33 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 5:08 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01 5:58 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01 8:19 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 10:40 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 13/18] block: add cdev_is_block_(device,partition,disk) helpers Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:35 ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 14/18] of: export new of_cdev_find helper Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:41 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 8:41 ` Ulrich Ölmann
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 15/18] state: factor device path lookup into helper function Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 17:54 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 5:14 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 16/18] cdev: use cdev::dos_partition_type only if cdev_is_mbr_partitioned Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 18:54 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 5:30 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 17/18] common: partitions: efi: record type UUID in cdev Ahmad Fatoum
[not found] ` <20230531193130.fgmvxm27dh3gbvhh@pengutronix.de>
2023-06-06 19:28 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-07 8:55 ` Marco Felsch
2023-05-31 14:59 ` [PATCH 18/18] state: allow lookup of barebox state partition by Type GUID Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-31 20:01 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 5:49 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01 8:11 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-01 10:44 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-01 8:05 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0166cc41-dd9b-728c-a478-85bb8ec5b196@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox