From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu ([92.103.151.219]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h7Gl6-00011n-6R for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:46:41 +0000 References: <20190321073332.b3725avve4p6ascg@pengutronix.de> <201903211025.18488.jbe@pengutronix.de> <73e974ac-11a7-6ee7-ee1a-d5fab51e3b2f@eurek.it> From: Yann Sionneau Message-ID: <09d70666-fe6d-0bfb-bbcc-e232d52d3e6d@kalray.eu> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:46:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <73e974ac-11a7-6ee7-ee1a-d5fab51e3b2f@eurek.it> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: STM32MP1 SoC support in latest Barebox To: gianluca , barebox@lists.infradead.org Hello, By searching in list archive you could have found: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2019-March/037572.html So there is a bit of support, which has been commited in "next" branch. See https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/tree/arch/arm/boards/stm32mp157c-dk2?h=next No idea how far this boots. On 3/22/19 9:07 AM, gianluca wrote: > Hello list! > > I need a __very quick__ answer to this subject, because a customer > wants to migrate from a iMX28 based board to a STM32MP1. > > Actually the iMX28 board was developed by me, 6 years ago and it has > Barebox 2013.02, Linux Kernel 3.12.1 and a Debian Wheezy. It runs from > eMMC, but it can boot from microSD for production line. > > I modified Barebox with custom made init scripts to enable some i2c > hardware before running Linux kernel, and Barebox had access/drivers > for ethernet, serial for debugging console, i2c (bit-banging) and some > gpios. > > It had access to ext4 filesystem on eMMC partition and managed somehow > the device tree to pass to Linux and it works like charms! > > Now I would like to know (without spending too much time to gitclone > the repo and reading the configuration stuff) if Barebox is still able > to boot off a microSD, and having the same drivers available as the > iMX28 has, just to reduce the porting session at their minimum levels. > > P.S.: I know UBoot for the evaluation board has all stuff I need, but > I hate the way it works: too messy, too #ifdef clauses, etc.,... > > Thank you in advance, _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox