From: Robert Karszniewicz <r.karszniewicz@phytec.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: storage: Increase retries for usb_stor_transport()
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:52:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ed26947-c690-72a9-2e24-8d00f444cab6@phytec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191104094250.wn2ib2fs7hspacou@pengutronix.de>
On 11/4/19 10:42 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Robert Karszniewicz wrote:
>> This should make writing and reading more reliable.
>>
>> Also:
>> - change loop condition to make "retries" semantically correct
>> - add a debug message in case of fatal failure
>> ---
>> We've had problems writing (and even reading) a 10 MiB file from barebox
>> to multiple USB flash drives.
>> The 10 MiB file copy failed with "write: I/O error" almost every time.
>> Increasing the retry count made 100 MiB file copies succeed every time.
>>
>
> Doing this doesn't hurt, so I applied this patch. I wonder though if
> there's something else wrong which makes increasing the retry counts
> necessary.
>
> Sascha
>
>
Thanks, yes, so I thought, too; it doesn't hurt, so I sent it in.
From when I looked at the problem, it seemed to me that the whole USB
flash drives thing is fickle. I glanced at the USB storage drivers of
Linux and saw that they have a bunch of workarounds and per-device
quirks. So Linux' drivers simply seem more mature and tolerant than
those in barebox.
Robert
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-04 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 15:56 Robert Karszniewicz
2019-10-25 16:07 ` [PATCH] test: " Robert Karszniewicz
2019-11-04 9:42 ` [PATCH] " Sascha Hauer
2019-11-04 14:52 ` Robert Karszniewicz [this message]
2019-11-04 14:54 ` Marco Felsch
2019-11-04 14:59 ` Robert Karszniewicz
2019-11-04 15:21 ` Marco Felsch
2019-11-04 15:28 ` Robert Karszniewicz
2019-11-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Robert Karszniewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ed26947-c690-72a9-2e24-8d00f444cab6@phytec.de \
--to=r.karszniewicz@phytec.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox