From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mickerik.phytec.de ([195.145.39.210]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ieaI8-0008Vz-I9 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 07:50:46 +0000 References: <1575894703-316604-1-git-send-email-s.riedmueller@phytec.de> <1575894703-316604-5-git-send-email-s.riedmueller@phytec.de> <20191209153740.w7klpla2pi6xlnnq@pengutronix.de> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_Riedm=c3=bcller?= Message-ID: <0edc4e68-8fd6-8e6d-450a-41db3ae975be@phytec.de> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:50:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191209153740.w7klpla2pi6xlnnq@pengutronix.de> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] ARM: dts: imx6: phycard: Use partname for environment device-path To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi Sascha, On 09.12.19 16:37, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Stefan Riedmueller wrote: >> Change environment device-path from using a separate label to >> referencing a device plus partname. > > Why? The way it was is fine. Just to be consistent with phyCORE and phyFLEX. Is there a downside I'm not aware of? Regards, Stefan > > Sascha > _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox