From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.visioncatalog.de ([217.6.246.34] helo=root.phytec.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OPZxD-00066Y-EQ for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:41:47 +0000 From: Teresa Gamez In-Reply-To: <20100610115454.GN20799@pengutronix.de> References: <1275991382.18173.37.camel@lws-gamez> <20100610115454.GN20799@pengutronix.de> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:41:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1276861302.27924.13.camel@lws-gamez> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mx2 GPIO OCRx register To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hello Sascha, is it reasonable to create a gpio_mode commad then? Or is there an other way to do this in the barebox shell? Teresa Am Donnerstag, den 10.06.2010, 13:54 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer: > Hi Teresa, > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:03:02PM +0200, Teresa Gamez wrote: > > The GPIO OCRx register has to be set correct or the output is not set as expected. > > No. The gpio functions are not expected to change the iomuxer. This is > what imx_gpio_mode() is for. > > Sascha _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox