From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Bastian Krause <bst@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH master] fs: ext4: fix bogus behavior on failure to read ext4 block
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:14:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <133339fd-ff71-db71-d6e6-d351297ac784@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325130446.GC609@pengutronix.de>
On 25.03.21 14:04, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 01:19:28PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> The conversion of blknr from a signed 32-bit to an unsigned 64-type resulted
>> in the check for error to never return true. Fix this.
>>
>> Affected configuration would behave incorrectly when served with invalid
>> blocks. Instead of aborting and having the filesystem bubble up an error
>> code, it would return invalid data. As there is no ext4 write support,
>> this wouldn't lead to ext4 data corruption however.
>>
>> Reported-by: Bastian Krause <bst@pengutronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/ext4fs.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4fs.c b/fs/ext4/ext4fs.c
>> index 54349aad3f3f..344d423fd9c4 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4fs.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4fs.c
>> @@ -74,11 +74,11 @@ loff_t ext4fs_read_file(struct ext2fs_node *node, loff_t pos,
>> loff_t blockend = blocksize;
>> loff_t skipfirst = 0;
>>
>> - blknr = read_allocated_block(node, i);
>> - if (blknr < 0)
>> - return blknr;
>> + ret = read_allocated_block(node, i);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>
> ret is a 32bit type. What about drives > 2T?
the first if-clause has a 64-bit type coerced to signed long, but the
rest will only return up to 32-bit, so this needs a bit more investigation.
The fix is correct regardless IMO, so it should go into master.
Expanding the type can go into next then.
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Sascha
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-24 12:19 Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-25 13:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-03-25 13:14 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2021-03-29 7:47 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=133339fd-ff71-db71-d6e6-d351297ac784@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bst@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sha@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox