From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] common: add mem_test routine
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:44:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360233900-26486-6-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360233900-26486-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com>
Useful to detect timing problems if someone porting a new
device to barebox.
This test includes a data bus test, address bus test and
integrity check of memory.
Allocated barebox regions between start and end will skip
automatically.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
---
common/Kconfig | 7 +
common/Makefile | 1 +
common/memory_test.c | 399 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/memory_test.h | 13 ++
4 files changed, 420 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 common/memory_test.c
create mode 100644 include/memory_test.h
diff --git a/common/Kconfig b/common/Kconfig
index 3f6c11e..c6988df 100644
--- a/common/Kconfig
+++ b/common/Kconfig
@@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ config MEMINFO
bool "display memory info"
default y
+config MEMTEST
+ bool "Offers routines for memory test"
+ help
+ Offers memtest routines in common/memory_test.c
+ This is helpful for porting devices to detect
+ memory timing problems.
+
config ENVIRONMENT_VARIABLES
bool "environment variables support"
diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile
index 7206eed..684953c 100644
--- a/common/Makefile
+++ b/common/Makefile
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MALLOC_DLMALLOC) += dlmalloc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MALLOC_TLSF) += tlsf_malloc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MALLOC_TLSF) += tlsf.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MALLOC_DUMMY) += dummy_malloc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MEMTEST) += memory_test.o
obj-y += clock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BANNER) += version.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MEMINFO) += meminfo.o
diff --git a/common/memory_test.c b/common/memory_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..80b4ff4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/common/memory_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,399 @@
+/*
+ * memory_test.c
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2013 Alexander Aring <aar@pengutronix.de>, Pengutronix
+ *
+ * See file CREDITS for list of people who contributed to this
+ * project.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <memory_test.h>
+
+static const vu_long bitpattern[] = {
+ 0x00000001, /* single bit */
+ 0x00000003, /* two adjacent bits */
+ 0x00000007, /* three adjacent bits */
+ 0x0000000F, /* four adjacent bits */
+ 0x00000005, /* two non-adjacent bits */
+ 0x00000015, /* three non-adjacent bits */
+ 0x00000055, /* four non-adjacent bits */
+ 0xAAAAAAAA, /* alternating 1/0 */
+};
+
+/*
+ * Perform a memory test. The complete test
+ * loops until interrupted by ctrl-c.
+ *
+ * Highly recommended to test with disabled and
+ * enabled cache.
+ *
+ * start: start address
+ * end: end address
+ * bus_only: skip integrity check
+ */
+int mem_test(vu_long _start, vu_long _end,
+ int bus_only)
+{
+ vu_long *start;
+ vu_long *dummy;
+
+ vu_long val;
+ vu_long readback;
+ vu_long offset;
+ vu_long offset2;
+ vu_long pattern;
+ vu_long temp;
+ vu_long anti_pattern;
+ vu_long num_words;
+
+ int i;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(_start, sizeof(vu_long)))
+ _start = ALIGN(_start, sizeof(vu_long));
+ /*
+ * check if end is a multiple of vu_long.
+ * need to add 1 because ALIGNED works with
+ * inclusive byte at end address.
+ *
+ * Also check on _end == 0. Otherwise we get a
+ * underflow.
+ */
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(_end + 1, sizeof(vu_long)) && _end)
+ _end = ALIGN_DOWN(_end, sizeof(vu_long)) - 1;
+
+ /*
+ * TODO
+ * recheck after align. That's not a quite
+ * solution now because we already done this
+ * in memtest command.
+ */
+ if (_end <= _start)
+ return -1;
+
+ start = (vu_long *)_start;
+ /*
+ * Point the dummy to start[1]
+ */
+ dummy = start+1;
+ num_words = (_end - _start + 1)/sizeof(vu_long);
+
+ /*
+ * Checking if start and dummy address are in one
+ * of barebox regions. Otherwise next data line testing
+ * will maybe fail.
+ */
+ ret = address_in_sdram_regions((vu_long)start);
+ ret |= address_in_sdram_regions((vu_long)dummy);
+ if (ret) {
+ printf("WARNING (data line): "
+ "address 0x%08lx is in sdram regions.\n"
+ "Try another start address to fix this issue.\n",
+ (vu_long)start);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ printf("Starting data line test.\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Data line test: write a pattern to the first
+ * location, write the 1's complement to a 'parking'
+ * address (changes the state of the data bus so a
+ * floating bus doen't give a false OK), and then
+ * read the value back. Note that we read it back
+ * into a variable because the next time we read it,
+ * it might be right (been there, tough to explain to
+ * the quality guys why it prints a failure when the
+ * "is" and "should be" are obviously the same in the
+ * error message).
+ *
+ * Rather than exhaustively testing, we test some
+ * patterns by shifting '1' bits through a field of
+ * '0's and '0' bits through a field of '1's (i.e.
+ * pattern and ~pattern).
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(bitpattern)/
+ sizeof(bitpattern[0]); i++) {
+ val = bitpattern[i];
+
+ for (; val != 0; val <<= 1) {
+ *start = val;
+ /* clear the test data off of the bus */
+ *dummy = ~val;
+ readback = *start;
+
+ if (readback != val) {
+ printf("FAILURE (data line): "
+ "expected 0x%08lx, actual 0x%08lx at address 0x%08lx.\n",
+ val, readback, (vu_long)start);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ *start = ~val;
+ *dummy = val;
+ readback = *start;
+ if (readback != ~val) {
+ printf("FAILURE (data line): "
+ "Is 0x%08lx, should be 0x%08lx at address 0x%08lx.\n",
+ readback,
+ ~val, (vu_long)start);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+
+ /*
+ * Based on code whose Original Author and Copyright
+ * information follows: Copyright (c) 1998 by Michael
+ * Barr. This software is placed into the public
+ * domain and may be used for any purpose. However,
+ * this notice must not be changed or removed and no
+ * warranty is either expressed or implied by its
+ * publication or distribution.
+ */
+
+ /*
+ * Address line test
+ *
+ * Description: Test the address bus wiring in a
+ * memory region by performing a walking
+ * 1's test on the relevant bits of the
+ * address and checking for aliasing.
+ * This test will find single-bit
+ * address failures such as stuck -high,
+ * stuck-low, and shorted pins. The base
+ * address and size of the region are
+ * selected by the caller.
+ *
+ * Notes: For best results, the selected base
+ * address should have enough LSB 0's to
+ * guarantee single address bit changes.
+ * For example, to test a 64-Kbyte
+ * region, select a base address on a
+ * 64-Kbyte boundary. Also, select the
+ * region size as a power-of-two if at
+ * all possible.
+ *
+ * ## NOTE ## Be sure to specify start and end
+ * addresses such that num_words has
+ * lots of bits set. For example an
+ * address range of 01000000 02000000 is
+ * bad while a range of 01000000
+ * 01ffffff is perfect.
+ */
+
+ pattern = 0xAAAAAAAA;
+ anti_pattern = 0x55555555;
+
+ /*
+ * Write the default pattern at each of the
+ * power-of-two offsets.
+ */
+ for (offset = 1; offset <= num_words; offset <<= 1) {
+ ret = address_in_sdram_regions((vu_long)&start[offset]);
+ if (ret) {
+ printf("WARNING (stuck high): "
+ "address 0x%08lx is in barebox regions.\n",
+ (vu_long)&start[offset]);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ start[offset] = pattern;
+ }
+
+ printf("Check for address bits stuck high.\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Check for address bits stuck high.
+ */
+ for (offset = 1; offset <= num_words; offset <<= 1) {
+ ret = address_in_sdram_regions((vu_long)&start[offset]);
+ if (ret)
+ continue;
+
+ temp = start[offset];
+ if (temp != pattern) {
+ printf("FAILURE: Address bit "
+ "stuck high @ 0x%08lx:"
+ " expected 0x%08lx, actual 0x%08lx.\n",
+ (vu_long)&start[offset],
+ pattern, temp);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ printf("Check for address bits stuck "
+ "low or shorted.\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Check for address bits stuck low or shorted.
+ */
+ for (offset2 = 1; offset2 <= num_words; offset2 <<= 1) {
+ ret = address_in_sdram_regions(
+ (vu_long)&start[offset2]);
+ if (ret) {
+ printf("WARNING (low high): "
+ "address 0x%08lx is in barebox regions.\n",
+ (vu_long)&start[offset2]);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ start[offset2] = anti_pattern;
+
+ for (offset = 1; offset <= num_words; offset <<= 1) {
+ ret = address_in_sdram_regions(
+ (vu_long)&start[offset]);
+ if (ret)
+ continue;
+
+ temp = start[offset];
+
+ /*
+ * That's some complicated for loop with
+ * condition offset != test_offset inside. I
+ * think this is necessary to put some another
+ * address on the bus.
+ *
+ * TODO
+ * check if loop is necessary.
+ */
+ if ((temp != pattern) &&
+ (offset != offset2)) {
+ printf("FAILURE: Address bit stuck"
+ " low or shorted @"
+ " 0x%08lx: expected 0x%08lx, actual 0x%08lx.\n",
+ (vu_long)&start[offset],
+ pattern, temp);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ start[offset2] = pattern;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We tested only the bus if != 0
+ * leaving here
+ */
+ if (bus_only)
+ return 0;
+
+ printf("Starting integrity check of physicaly ram.\n"
+ "Filling ram with patterns...\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Description: Test the integrity of a physical
+ * memory device by performing an
+ * increment/decrement test over the
+ * entire region. In the process every
+ * storage bit in the device is tested
+ * as a zero and a one. The base address
+ * and the size of the region are
+ * selected by the caller.
+ */
+
+ /*
+ * Fill memory with a known pattern.
+ */
+ init_progression_bar(num_words);
+ for (offset = 0; offset < num_words; offset++) {
+ if (!(offset & 0xfff)) {
+ if (ctrlc())
+ return -EINTR;
+ show_progress(offset);
+ }
+
+ ret = address_in_sdram_regions((vu_long)&start[offset]);
+ if (ret)
+ continue;
+
+ start[offset] = offset + 1;
+ }
+
+ show_progress(offset);
+
+ printf("\nCompare written patterns...\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Check each location and invert it for the second pass.
+ */
+ init_progression_bar(num_words - 1);
+ for (offset = 0; offset < num_words; offset++) {
+ if (!(offset & 0xfff)) {
+ if (ctrlc())
+ return -EINTR;
+ show_progress(offset);
+ }
+
+ ret = address_in_sdram_regions((vu_long)&start[offset]);
+ if (ret)
+ continue;
+
+ temp = start[offset];
+ if (temp != (offset + 1)) {
+ printf("\nFAILURE (read/write) @ 0x%08lx:"
+ " expected 0x%08lx, actual 0x%08lx.\n",
+ (vu_long)&start[offset],
+ (offset + 1), temp);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ anti_pattern = ~(offset + 1);
+ start[offset] = anti_pattern;
+ }
+
+ show_progress(offset);
+
+ printf("\nFilling ram with inverted pattern and compare it...\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Check each location for the inverted pattern and zero it.
+ */
+ init_progression_bar(num_words - 1);
+ for (offset = 0; offset < num_words; offset++) {
+ if (!(offset & 0xfff)) {
+ if (ctrlc())
+ return -EINTR;
+ show_progress(offset);
+ }
+
+ ret = address_in_sdram_regions((vu_long)&start[offset]);
+ /*
+ * Step over barebox mem usage
+ */
+ if (ret)
+ continue;
+
+ anti_pattern = ~(offset + 1);
+ temp = start[offset];
+
+ if (temp != anti_pattern) {
+ printf("\nFAILURE (read/write): @ 0x%08lx:"
+ " expected 0x%08lx, actual 0x%08lx.\n",
+ (vu_long)&start[offset],
+ anti_pattern, temp);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ start[offset] = 0;
+ }
+
+ show_progress(offset);
+
+ /*
+ * end of progressbar
+ */
+ printf("\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/include/memory_test.h b/include/memory_test.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6959dc6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/memory_test.h
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+
+#ifndef __MEMORY_TEST_H
+#define __MEMORY_TEST_H
+
+#include <progress.h>
+#include <common.h>
+#include <memory.h>
+#include <types.h>
+
+int mem_test(vu_long _start, vu_long _end,
+ int bus_only);
+
+#endif
--
1.8.1.2
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-07 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-07 10:44 [PATCH v3 0/6] add new memtest command Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] common: fix codestyle in ALIGN macros Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] common: add ALIGN_DOWN macro Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] memory: add function address_in_sdram_regions Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] memtest: remove memtest command Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 10:44 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2013-02-07 10:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] common: add mem_test routine Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-02-07 11:16 ` Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 11:00 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-02-07 11:40 ` Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 11:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-02-07 15:41 ` Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 10:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] commands: add new memtest command Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 10:56 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-02-07 11:20 ` Alexander Aring
2013-02-07 12:01 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-02-07 15:42 ` Alexander Aring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1360233900-26486-6-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com \
--to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox