From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.phytec.co.uk ([217.6.246.34] helo=root.phytec.de) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1U3pmL-0000uN-05 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:22:18 +0000 Received: from idefix.phytec.de (idefix.phytec.de [172.16.0.10]) by root.phytec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBA9BF0ED for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:36:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1360336929.3798.11.camel@lws-weitzel> From: Jan Weitzel Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:22:09 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: J.Weitzel@phytec.de List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: v2013.02.0 phyCORE-OMAP4 MLO to big To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi, with the release v2013.02.0 the MLO gets so bit, that it eats the boot information in the SRAM. nm --size-sort ... 00000630 D nand_flash_ids 000008c0 t mci_probe 00000c00 b gpio_desc 00001400 b files If I remove GPIOLIB from MLO it work again. Maybe setting MAX_FILES down or find a dynamic way for the big arrays is a better solution. Any Ideas? Jan _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox