From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from f386.i.mail.ru ([185.5.136.57]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ub8ZC-0002EX-8O for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 12:06:23 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleGFuZGVyIFNoaXlhbg==?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 16:05:56 +0400 Message-ID: <1368273956.326411741@f386.i.mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <20130511113155.GE19265@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1368194658-2961-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> <1368269656.44400096@f345.mail.ru> <20130511113155.GE19265@game.jcrosoft.org> Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleGFuZGVyIFNoaXlhbg==?= List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmVbMl06IFtQQVRDSF0gR1BJTzogQWRkIGdwaW9fdG9fZGVzYyBoZWxwZXI=?= To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1DaHJpc3RvcGhlIFBMQUdOSU9MLVZJTExBUkQ=?= Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org > > > On 18:04 Fri 10 May , Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > > > Patch adds gpio_to_desc helper for validate GPIO. > > > > A bit optimization is performed (about -250 bytes on ARM). > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > > > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > index 6398268..d7aa094 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > @@ -32,20 +32,30 @@ static int gpio_ensure_requested(struct gpio_info *gi, int gpio) > > > > return gpio_request(gpio, "gpio"); > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static struct gpio_info *gpio_to_desc(unsigned gpio) > > > > +{ > > > > + if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) > > > put the WARN too as we need to known a gpio_xxx is used on a non valid gpio > > > > Original bb code does not contain any warnings here. So if it really > > necessary it can be added later. > > put it as we keep the code inline with the kernel a key point for sync And this warning avoid my second patch to remove checks when we are call gpio_free/set/get etc... with non existent (optional) gpios. I strongly do not want to add it. --- _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox