* [PATCH] arm: mach-mvebu: drop useless clkdev.h
@ 2013-05-12 11:26 Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 8:19 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2013-05-12 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
As suggested by Antony Pavlov, get rid of the useless clkdev.h in
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 04b37a8..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-#ifndef __ASM_MACH_CLKDEV_H
-#define __ASM_MACH_CLKDEV_H
-
-#define __clk_get(clk) ({ 1; })
-#define __clk_put(clk) do { } while (0)
-
-#endif
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-mvebu: drop useless clkdev.h
2013-05-12 11:26 [PATCH] arm: mach-mvebu: drop useless clkdev.h Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2013-05-13 8:19 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-05-13 8:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2013-05-13 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Petazzoni; +Cc: barebox
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> As suggested by Antony Pavlov, get rid of the useless clkdev.h in
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Folded this into the original patch adding it.
Sascha
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 04b37a8..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/clkdev.h
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
> -#ifndef __ASM_MACH_CLKDEV_H
> -#define __ASM_MACH_CLKDEV_H
> -
> -#define __clk_get(clk) ({ 1; })
> -#define __clk_put(clk) do { } while (0)
> -
> -#endif
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-mvebu: drop useless clkdev.h
2013-05-13 8:19 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2013-05-13 8:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 11:53 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2013-05-13 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox
Dear Sascha Hauer,
On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:19:07 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > As suggested by Antony Pavlov, get rid of the useless clkdev.h in
> > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
>
> Folded this into the original patch adding it.
Just a development process question: since you're folding it, it means
that you're rebasing the 'next' branch constantly?
This sounds off for a public branch on top of which people might be
basing some more work, no?
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-mvebu: drop useless clkdev.h
2013-05-13 8:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2013-05-13 11:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-05-13 12:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2013-05-13 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Petazzoni; +Cc: barebox
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:39:24AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Sascha Hauer,
>
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:19:07 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > As suggested by Antony Pavlov, get rid of the useless clkdev.h in
> > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > Folded this into the original patch adding it.
>
> Just a development process question: since you're folding it, it means
> that you're rebasing the 'next' branch constantly?
>
> This sounds off for a public branch on top of which people might be
> basing some more work, no?
You should normally be able to work on the master branch. If you have
dependencies to -next then yes, you would have to rebase which means
some work for you.
Not having a fast forward branch means that we have a better commit
history and that bugs noticed early enough do not even make it to the
master branch which increases bisectability significantly.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-mvebu: drop useless clkdev.h
2013-05-13 11:53 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2013-05-13 12:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2013-05-13 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox
Dear Sascha Hauer,
On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:53:22 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> You should normally be able to work on the master branch. If you have
> dependencies to -next then yes, you would have to rebase which means
> some work for you.
> Not having a fast forward branch means that we have a better commit
> history and that bugs noticed early enough do not even make it to the
> master branch which increases bisectability significantly.
Ok, good to know. Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-13 12:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-12 11:26 [PATCH] arm: mach-mvebu: drop useless clkdev.h Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 8:19 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-05-13 8:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 11:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-05-13 12:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox