Re: barebox-2013.07/08.0 works from RAM but fails from NAND (Mini2440)

Re: barebox-2013.07/08.0 works from RAM but fails from NAND (Mini2440)

[Pawel Suchanecki]

2013/8/8 Pawel Suchanecki <pawel.suchanecki@gmail.com>:
> Dear list & developers,
>
> My barebox works (I get barebox prompt and can boot from there) when loaded
> to ram by (super)vivi but does not when I flash it to NAND.
>
> Barebox does not output anything to the console. It also fails using
> "friendlyarm_mini2440_defconfig". It behaves the same in 2013.07.0 and
> 2013.08.0.
>
> Please direct me: where can I look for the misconfiguration? What did I do
> wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Pawel.

Hi again,

I found the thread in which Cristiano already reported such behaviour, namely:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.barebox/10142

Seems I am in same situation. Barebox.2013.05.1 starts from NAND.

Thanks,
Pawel

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: barebox-2013.07/08.0 works from RAM but fails from NAND (Mini2440)

[Alexander Shiyan]

> 2013/8/8 Pawel Suchanecki <pawel.suchanecki@gmail.com>:
> > Dear list & developers,
> >
> > My barebox works (I get barebox prompt and can boot from there) when loaded
> > to ram by (super)vivi but does not when I flash it to NAND.
> >
> > Barebox does not output anything to the console. It also fails using
> > "friendlyarm_mini2440_defconfig". It behaves the same in 2013.07.0 and
> > 2013.08.0.
> >
> > Please direct me: where can I look for the misconfiguration? What did I do
> > wrong?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pawel.
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> I found the thread in which Cristiano already reported such behaviour, namely:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.barebox/10142
> 
> Seems I am in same situation. Barebox.2013.05.1 starts from NAND.

The easy way to resolve this issue is "git bisect".
Can you try to do it?

---
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: Re: barebox-2013.07/08.0 works from RAM but fails from NAND (Mini2440)

[Cristiano Rodrigues]

On Thursday 08 August 2013 18:52:47 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > 2013/8/8 Pawel Suchanecki <pawel.suchanecki@gmail.com>:
> > > Dear list & developers,
> > > 
> > > My barebox works (I get barebox prompt and can boot from there) when
> > > loaded
Hi there :)

It is the first commit after the barebox version 2013.05.1 that is breaking 
the mini2440 NAND boot.

cris@ProBook:~/mini2440/Boot/barebox_git$ git bisect bad
5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3 is the first bad commit
commit 5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3
Author: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Date:   Tue Apr 9 19:05:31 2013 +0400

    ARM: cpuimx51: Use custom padctrl for fec
    
    The fec padctrl is different from what we have in the kernel iomux
    file. To be able to keep the iomux file in sync with the kernel, use
    a custom padctrl for the cpuimx51 board.
    
    Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
    Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

:040000 040000 7196169700f35cef11d849e562784591874f770d 
7a4888609304c2de992b22da06ad206189dde06b M      arch

> > > to ram by (super)vivi but does not when I flash it to NAND.
> > > 
> > > Barebox does not output anything to the console. It also fails using
> > > "friendlyarm_mini2440_defconfig". It behaves the same in 2013.07.0 and
> > > 2013.08.0.
> > > 
> > > Please direct me: where can I look for the misconfiguration? What did I
> > > do
> > > wrong?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Pawel.
> > 
> > Hi again,
> > 
> > I found the thread in which Cristiano already reported such behaviour,
> > namely: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.barebox/10142
> > 
> > Seems I am in same situation. Barebox.2013.05.1 starts from NAND.
> 
> The easy way to resolve this issue is "git bisect".
> Can you try to do it?
> 
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: barebox-2013.07/08.0 works from RAM but fails from NAND (Mini2440)

[Alexander Shiyan]

> On Thursday 08 August 2013 18:52:47 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > 2013/8/8 Pawel Suchanecki <pawel.suchanecki@gmail.com>:
> > > > Dear list & developers,
> > > > 
> > > > My barebox works (I get barebox prompt and can boot from there) when
> > > > loaded
> Hi there :)
> 
> It is the first commit after the barebox version 2013.05.1 that is breaking 
> the mini2440 NAND boot.
> 
> cris@ProBook:~/mini2440/Boot/barebox_git$ git bisect bad
> 5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3 is the first bad commit
> commit 5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3
> Author: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> Date:   Tue Apr 9 19:05:31 2013 +0400
> 
>     ARM: cpuimx51: Use custom padctrl for fec
>     
>     The fec padctrl is different from what we have in the kernel iomux
>     file. To be able to keep the iomux file in sync with the kernel, use
>     a custom padctrl for the cpuimx51 board.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
>     Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

Seems something incorrect since patch is touched i.MX arch only.

---
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: Re: barebox-2013.07/08.0 works from RAM but fails from NAND (Mini2440)

[Cristiano Rodrigues]

Thanks for trying to help :)

here it is the git bisect log:
git bisect start
# bad: [1f3ac50f527932b4409cf4b3cf84f4be02a65be5] ARM: bootm: Print Kernel 
commandline unconditionally
git bisect bad 1f3ac50f527932b4409cf4b3cf84f4be02a65be5
# good: [2aca947c785bfc46bb5bce75ed1f69c285ac3f36] Release v2013.05.1
git bisect good 2aca947c785bfc46bb5bce75ed1f69c285ac3f36
# good: [5fdb9c0829b12e042e8fa1131bf2eee180e2b11b] Release v2013.05.0
git bisect good 5fdb9c0829b12e042e8fa1131bf2eee180e2b11b
# bad: [5f56c3506007eea1a284cdc55f8b3e60de67f2cc] Merge branch 'for-next/of'
git bisect bad 5f56c3506007eea1a284cdc55f8b3e60de67f2cc
# bad: [cd07f67a300f7c938952c38d909a70d4bc45db57] arm: mvebu: remove useless 
lines in kwbimage.cfg for CuBox
git bisect bad cd07f67a300f7c938952c38d909a70d4bc45db57
# bad: [da1ada40d27c734ec51f1da924b2ecbbd28115c1] Merge branch 'for-next/omap'
git bisect bad da1ada40d27c734ec51f1da924b2ecbbd28115c1
# good: [3cdd18632e72cbb8b0402df3e4821dfd7d24643b] Merge branch 'for-
next/memory-commands'
git bisect good 3cdd18632e72cbb8b0402df3e4821dfd7d24643b
# good: [c8af035b4176af0e8da2cdd2d10109b56e06444e] Merge branch 'for-
next/misc'
git bisect good c8af035b4176af0e8da2cdd2d10109b56e06444e
# good: [32dc070fd499a8a0bc4bc434fe74319c7463a97a] pinctrl: move imx-iomux-v1 
to drivers/pinctrl/
git bisect good 32dc070fd499a8a0bc4bc434fe74319c7463a97a
# good: [579b794b5d13e4a1ffa21d2426bfab7050eaba9d] Merge branch 'for-next/of'
git bisect good 579b794b5d13e4a1ffa21d2426bfab7050eaba9d
# good: [a6fda1886a40ecf89573ec53c3abae87fe59bba7] beaglebone: remove stray 
semicolon
git bisect good a6fda1886a40ecf89573ec53c3abae87fe59bba7
# good: [98839ca886a1e146091e06799cde6c9912f77863] m33xx-clock: configure PLLs 
based on oscillator frequency
git bisect good 98839ca886a1e146091e06799cde6c9912f77863
# good: [de5b9f71bf8d3afbe9503b98acef9a93f1e08881] m33xx-clock: remove unused 
code
git bisect good de5b9f71bf8d3afbe9503b98acef9a93f1e08881
# first bad commit: [da1ada40d27c734ec51f1da924b2ecbbd28115c1] Merge branch 
'for-next/omap'

On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:47:07 you wrote:
> > 64MB of SDRAM
> 
> No, seems it is other problem.
> So, I cannot say more here. Just try to retry git bisect
> with bad v2013.06.0 and good v2013.05.0 (yes 5.0, not 5.1).
> So, as first do:
> git bisect reset
> then
> git bisect start
> git bisect good  v2013.05.0
> git bisect bad v2013.06.0
> and mark commits (in proper state) as in previous case.
> 
> > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:36:23 you wrote:
> > > > v2013.05.0 ->good
> > > > v2013.05.1 ->good
> > > > v2013.06.0 ->bad
> > > 
> > > Ok. I suspect one thing, but as first tell me size of SDRAM on your
> > > borad.
> > > 
> > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:31:45 you wrote:
> > > > > > you are right. the patch is only for i.MX and is older than
> > > > > > 2013.05
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I'm checking again
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:24:57 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 18:52:47 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > 2013/8/8 Pawel Suchanecki <pawel.suchanecki@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Dear list & developers,
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > My barebox works (I get barebox prompt and can boot from
> > > > > > > > > > > there)
> > > > > > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > > > loaded
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Hi there :)
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > It is the first commit after the barebox version 2013.05.1
> > > > > > > > that is
> > > > > > > > breaking
> > > > > > > > the mini2440 NAND boot.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > cris@ProBook:~/mini2440/Boot/barebox_git$ git bisect bad
> > > > > > > > 5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3 is the first bad
> > > > > > > > commit
> > > > > > > > commit 5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3
> > > > > > > > Author: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> > > > > > > > Date:   Tue Apr 9 19:05:31 2013 +0400
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     ARM: cpuimx51: Use custom padctrl for fec
> > > > > > > >     
> > > > > > > >     The fec padctrl is different from what we have in the
> > > > > > > >     kernel
> > > > > > > >     iomux
> > > > > > > >     file. To be able to keep the iomux file in sync with the
> > > > > > > >     kernel,
> > > > > > > >     use
> > > > > > > >     a custom padctrl for the cpuimx51 board.
> > > > > > > >     
> > > > > > > >     Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> > > > > > > >     Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Seems something incorrect since patch is touched i.MX arch only.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Which exact barebox version is known as good and bad?
> > > > > Can you try all? (v2013.05.0, v2013.05.1,v2013.06.0 etc...)
> 
> ---

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: Re: Re: barebox-2013.07/08.0 works from RAM but fails from NAND (Mini2440)

[Cristiano Rodrigues]

Hi again :)

The problem is solved.

barebox 2013.08.0-00156-g72826e7-dirty -> boot from NAND without problem

On Thursday 08 August 2013 17:11:28 Cristiano Rodrigues wrote
> Thanks for trying to help :)
> 
> here it is the git bisect log:
> git bisect start
> # bad: [1f3ac50f527932b4409cf4b3cf84f4be02a65be5] ARM: bootm: Print Kernel
> commandline unconditionally
> git bisect bad 1f3ac50f527932b4409cf4b3cf84f4be02a65be5
> # good: [2aca947c785bfc46bb5bce75ed1f69c285ac3f36] Release v2013.05.1
> git bisect good 2aca947c785bfc46bb5bce75ed1f69c285ac3f36
> # good: [5fdb9c0829b12e042e8fa1131bf2eee180e2b11b] Release v2013.05.0
> git bisect good 5fdb9c0829b12e042e8fa1131bf2eee180e2b11b
> # bad: [5f56c3506007eea1a284cdc55f8b3e60de67f2cc] Merge branch 'for-next/of'
> git bisect bad 5f56c3506007eea1a284cdc55f8b3e60de67f2cc
> # bad: [cd07f67a300f7c938952c38d909a70d4bc45db57] arm: mvebu: remove useless
> lines in kwbimage.cfg for CuBox
> git bisect bad cd07f67a300f7c938952c38d909a70d4bc45db57
> # bad: [da1ada40d27c734ec51f1da924b2ecbbd28115c1] Merge branch
> 'for-next/omap' git bisect bad da1ada40d27c734ec51f1da924b2ecbbd28115c1
> # good: [3cdd18632e72cbb8b0402df3e4821dfd7d24643b] Merge branch 'for-
> next/memory-commands'
> git bisect good 3cdd18632e72cbb8b0402df3e4821dfd7d24643b
> # good: [c8af035b4176af0e8da2cdd2d10109b56e06444e] Merge branch 'for-
> next/misc'
> git bisect good c8af035b4176af0e8da2cdd2d10109b56e06444e
> # good: [32dc070fd499a8a0bc4bc434fe74319c7463a97a] pinctrl: move
> imx-iomux-v1 to drivers/pinctrl/
> git bisect good 32dc070fd499a8a0bc4bc434fe74319c7463a97a
> # good: [579b794b5d13e4a1ffa21d2426bfab7050eaba9d] Merge branch
> 'for-next/of' git bisect good 579b794b5d13e4a1ffa21d2426bfab7050eaba9d
> # good: [a6fda1886a40ecf89573ec53c3abae87fe59bba7] beaglebone: remove stray
> semicolon
> git bisect good a6fda1886a40ecf89573ec53c3abae87fe59bba7
> # good: [98839ca886a1e146091e06799cde6c9912f77863] m33xx-clock: configure
> PLLs based on oscillator frequency
> git bisect good 98839ca886a1e146091e06799cde6c9912f77863
> # good: [de5b9f71bf8d3afbe9503b98acef9a93f1e08881] m33xx-clock: remove
> unused code
> git bisect good de5b9f71bf8d3afbe9503b98acef9a93f1e08881
> # first bad commit: [da1ada40d27c734ec51f1da924b2ecbbd28115c1] Merge branch
> 'for-next/omap'
> 
> On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:47:07 you wrote:
> > > 64MB of SDRAM
> > 
> > No, seems it is other problem.
> > So, I cannot say more here. Just try to retry git bisect
> > with bad v2013.06.0 and good v2013.05.0 (yes 5.0, not 5.1).
> > So, as first do:
> > git bisect reset
> > then
> > git bisect start
> > git bisect good  v2013.05.0
> > git bisect bad v2013.06.0
> > and mark commits (in proper state) as in previous case.
> > 
> > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:36:23 you wrote:
> > > > > v2013.05.0 ->good
> > > > > v2013.05.1 ->good
> > > > > v2013.06.0 ->bad
> > > > 
> > > > Ok. I suspect one thing, but as first tell me size of SDRAM on your
> > > > borad.
> > > > 
> > > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:31:45 you wrote:
> > > > > > > you are right. the patch is only for i.MX and is older than
> > > > > > > 2013.05
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I'm checking again
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:24:57 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 18:52:47 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2013/8/8 Pawel Suchanecki <pawel.suchanecki@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear list & developers,
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > My barebox works (I get barebox prompt and can boot
> > > > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > there)
> > > > > > > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > > > > loaded
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Hi there :)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > It is the first commit after the barebox version 2013.05.1
> > > > > > > > > that is
> > > > > > > > > breaking
> > > > > > > > > the mini2440 NAND boot.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > cris@ProBook:~/mini2440/Boot/barebox_git$ git bisect bad
> > > > > > > > > 5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3 is the first bad
> > > > > > > > > commit
> > > > > > > > > commit 5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3
> > > > > > > > > Author: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> > > > > > > > > Date:   Tue Apr 9 19:05:31 2013 +0400
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >     ARM: cpuimx51: Use custom padctrl for fec
> > > > > > > > >     
> > > > > > > > >     The fec padctrl is different from what we have in the
> > > > > > > > >     kernel
> > > > > > > > >     iomux
> > > > > > > > >     file. To be able to keep the iomux file in sync with the
> > > > > > > > >     kernel,
> > > > > > > > >     use
> > > > > > > > >     a custom padctrl for the cpuimx51 board.
> > > > > > > > >     
> > > > > > > > >     Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> > > > > > > > >     Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Seems something incorrect since patch is touched i.MX arch
> > > > > > > > only.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Which exact barebox version is known as good and bad?
> > > > > > Can you try all? (v2013.05.0, v2013.05.1,v2013.06.0 etc...)
> > 
> > ---
> 
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

barebox-2013.07/08.0 works from RAM but fails from NAND (Mini2440)

[Pawel Suchanecki]

Dear list & developers,

My barebox works (I get barebox prompt and can boot from there) when
loaded to ram by (super)vivi but does not when I flash it to NAND.

Barebox does not output anything to the console. It also fails using
"friendlyarm_mini2440_defconfig". It behaves the same in 2013.07.0 and
2013.08.0.

Please direct me: where can I look for the misconfiguration? What did
I do wrong?

Thanks,
Pawel.

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox