From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@kymetacorp.com>
To: Peter Mamonov <pmamonov@gmail.com>
Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] common: filetype: do not redetect MBR-type devices as a FAT-type
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:49:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447094995.4553.50.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447065171-31571-1-git-send-email-pmamonov@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 13:32 +0300, Peter Mamonov wrote:
> Deleted pieces of code detect MBR-containig device as a FAT-type device,
> if it's first partition contains a FAT filesystem. This behaviour enabled one
> to mount the FAT FS which is either directly on the device (disk0) or on
> the first partition (disk0.0) using the same command:
> mount /dev/disk0 /fat
> However, the desired behaviour can be reached with a:
> mount /dev/disk0 /fat || mount /dev/disk0.0 /fat || echo "Mounting failed"
The in flash env for omap is found by mounting a FAT filesystem and
reading an env file from it. The code that does this uses the disk as
the device, rather than the partition. Which I thought was odd and
wondered why/if that worked correctly....
Anyway, this change would break that code. I suspect than instead of
coding the disk0 || disk0.0 method it could just mount disk0.0. Because
the code does this (edited):
partname = asprintf("/dev/%s.0", diskdev);
ret = stat(partname, &s);
if (ret) {
pr_err("Failed to load environment: no device '%s'\n", diskdev);
return 0;
}
ret = mount(diskdev, "fat", "/boot", NULL);
If disk0.0 didn't exist then it wouldn't try to mount it in the 1st
place, so the ability of trying both disk0 and disk0.0 wouldn't be used.
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-09 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 10:32 Peter Mamonov
2015-11-09 11:18 ` Antony Pavlov
2015-11-09 18:49 ` Trent Piepho [this message]
2015-11-10 8:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-11-10 8:15 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-11-10 18:44 ` Trent Piepho
2015-11-11 7:35 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447094995.4553.50.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local \
--to=tpiepho@kymetacorp.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pmamonov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox