From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@kymetacorp.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: Add for_each_compatible_node_from iterator
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:58:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452020291.4474.13.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160105075831.GO13058@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 08:58 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:07:27PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > Couldn't one also use the of fixup system to modify the barebox DT? In
> > order to support multiple board variants, I added DT nodes that specify
> > what nodes should be enabled and/or disabled for different board
> > versions. An OF fixup applies this to the Linux DT. I haven't had to
> > modify the barebox DT for different boards but anticipate that happening
> > for the next board and I was planning to use the same system.
>
> I think you don't need the fixup system to accomplish that. Just hook up
> to an initcall early enough and modify the barebox device tree. It
> shouldn't be necessary to register a callback first and then wait for
> its execution.
My thought was that the fixup already registered for the Linux device
tree would also cover the barebox tree, including things like oftree -l
to load a new one. Calling the fixup function from an initcall wouldn't
get that. I guess I'll see what happens when I need that feature.
> Are you aware of device tree overlays? We planned to merge support for
> them into barebox once the official device tree compiler supports them.
> Unfortunately this hasn't happened yet.
I thought of that, and also using include files and generating a bunch
of device trees, but decided against it. It would be a lot of work to
add support for generating multiple device trees into the kernel build
system and buildroot which is driving everything. And then you have a
pile of device tree/overlay files to keep track of. And barebox has to
figure out which one to load for the kernel.
So I made a system where everything is supported by one device tree.
I also added support for specifying a tree to boot barebox with, hence
my patches for arm boot calling convention, but decided having the
xloader find a device tree fragment and pass it to the main barebox was
going to be too much of a pain. Thus the one tree to rule them all
solution.
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-19 0:13 Trent Piepho
2015-12-19 0:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] of: Add of_property_for_each_phandle() iterator Trent Piepho
2016-01-04 8:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] of: Add for_each_compatible_node_from iterator Sascha Hauer
2016-01-04 19:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] OF: fix typo in for_each_compatible_node() Trent Piepho
2016-01-05 7:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-01-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] OF: Fix fixups to fix Linux DT instead of Barebox DT Trent Piepho
2016-01-05 7:50 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-01-04 19:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] of: Add for_each_compatible_node_from iterator Trent Piepho
2016-01-05 7:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-01-05 8:05 ` Yegor Yefremov
2016-01-05 8:20 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-01-05 8:30 ` Yegor Yefremov
2016-01-05 18:58 ` Trent Piepho [this message]
2016-01-07 7:34 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452020291.4474.13.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local \
--to=tpiepho@kymetacorp.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox