From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] of_path: Make partition names work again
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:27:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452166031-9973-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> (raw)
The device-path "partname:<name>" mechanism is broken by:
75b6827 of_path: of_find_path() factor out device detection logic into separate function
This is because since said commit the device-path property is no longer
searched in the original device node anymore, but in the device node
of the device itself.
Fix this by passing the partition name directly to __of_find_path.
Originally it was intended to further extend the multi string property
device-path further with more elements, like for example a filename. It
turned out though that this is too complex and instead of further
extending the property we should instead create additional properties,
so this mechanism is removed with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/of/of_path.c | 125 ++++++++++++---------------------------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_path.c b/drivers/of/of_path.c
index 6903905..35d3576 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_path.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_path.c
@@ -23,16 +23,6 @@
#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
-struct of_path {
- struct cdev *cdev;
- struct device_d *dev;
-};
-
-struct of_path_type {
- const char *name;
- int (*parse)(struct of_path *op, const char *str);
-};
-
struct device_d *of_find_device_by_node_path(const char *path)
{
struct device_d *dev;
@@ -47,103 +37,34 @@ struct device_d *of_find_device_by_node_path(const char *path)
return NULL;
}
-/**
- * of_path_type_partname - find a partition based on physical device and
- * partition name
- * @op: of_path context
- * @name: the partition name to find
- */
-static int of_path_type_partname(struct of_path *op, const char *name)
-{
- if (!op->dev)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- op->cdev = device_find_partition(op->dev, name);
- if (op->cdev) {
- pr_debug("%s: found part '%s'\n", __func__, name);
- return 0;
- } else {
- pr_debug("%s: cannot find part '%s'\n", __func__, name);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-}
-
-static struct of_path_type of_path_types[] = {
- {
- .name = "partname",
- .parse = of_path_type_partname,
- },
-};
-
-static int of_path_parse_one(struct of_path *op, const char *str)
-{
- int i, ret;
- char *name, *desc;
-
- pr_debug("parsing: %s\n", str);
-
- name = xstrdup(str);
- desc = strchr(name, ':');
- if (!desc) {
- free(name);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- *desc = 0;
- desc++;
-
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(of_path_types); i++) {
- if (!strcmp(of_path_types[i].name, name)) {
- ret = of_path_types[i].parse(op, desc);
- goto out;
- }
- }
-
- ret = -EINVAL;
-out:
- free(name);
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-static int __of_find_path(struct device_node *node, const char *propname, char **outpath, unsigned flags)
+static int __of_find_path(struct device_node *node, const char *partname, char **outpath, unsigned flags)
{
- struct of_path op = {};
- const char *str;
+ struct device_d *dev;
+ struct cdev *cdev;
bool add_bb = false;
- int i, ret;
- op.dev = of_find_device_by_node_path(node->full_name);
- if (!op.dev) {
- op.dev = of_find_device_by_node_path(node->parent->full_name);
- if (!op.dev)
+ dev = of_find_device_by_node_path(node->full_name);
+ if (!dev) {
+ dev = of_find_device_by_node_path(node->parent->full_name);
+ if (!dev)
return -ENODEV;
}
- device_detect(op.dev);
-
- op.cdev = cdev_by_device_node(node);
+ device_detect(dev);
- i = 1;
+ if (partname)
+ cdev = device_find_partition(dev, partname);
+ else
+ cdev = cdev_by_device_node(node);
- while (propname) {
- ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, propname, i++, &str);
- if (ret)
- break;
-
- ret = of_path_parse_one(&op, str);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
-
- if (!op.cdev)
+ if (!cdev)
return -ENOENT;
- if ((flags & OF_FIND_PATH_FLAGS_BB) && op.cdev->mtd &&
- mtd_can_have_bb(op.cdev->mtd))
+ if ((flags & OF_FIND_PATH_FLAGS_BB) && cdev->mtd &&
+ mtd_can_have_bb(cdev->mtd))
add_bb = true;
- *outpath = asprintf("/dev/%s%s", op.cdev->name, add_bb ? ".bb" : "");
+ *outpath = asprintf("/dev/%s%s", cdev->name, add_bb ? ".bb" : "");
return 0;
}
@@ -193,6 +114,8 @@ int of_find_path(struct device_node *node, const char *propname, char **outpath,
{
struct device_node *rnode;
const char *path;
+ const char *partname = NULL;
+ char partnamestr[] = "partname:";
path = of_get_property(node, propname, NULL);
if (!path)
@@ -202,5 +125,15 @@ int of_find_path(struct device_node *node, const char *propname, char **outpath,
if (!rnode)
return -ENODEV;
- return __of_find_path(rnode, propname, outpath, flags);
+ of_property_read_string_index(node, propname, 1, &partname);
+ if (partname) {
+ if (!strncmp(partname, partnamestr, sizeof(partnamestr) - 1)) {
+ partname += sizeof(partnamestr) - 1;
+ } else {
+ pr_err("Invalid device-path: %s\n", partname);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return __of_find_path(rnode, partname, outpath, flags);
}
--
2.6.4
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 11:27 Sascha Hauer [this message]
2016-01-07 18:31 ` Trent Piepho
2016-01-08 7:34 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452166031-9973-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox