From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.phytec.de ([217.6.246.34] helo=root.phytec.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1b5a1p-00028g-Vr for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 14:43:23 +0000 Message-ID: <1464187352.4917.26.camel@lws-tremmet.phytec.de> From: Teresa Remmet Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 16:42:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160525133302.GD21031@pengutronix.de> References: <1463992010-31537-1-git-send-email-t.remmet@phytec.de> <20160525133302.GD21031@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/62] Update UBI To: Robert Schwebel Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hello Robert, Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2016, 15:33 +0200 schrieb Robert Schwebel: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:25:48AM +0200, Teresa Remmet wrote: > > this series is more or less just a cherry-pick of the UBI patches > > from kernel to version v4.6. Rework was need for some patches to make > > them apply and work for barebox. > > These patches should have your Signed-off-by:. I added the Signed-off to all patches I had to touch manually due to a conflict. A lot applied luckily just out of the box. Did I miss any? Regards, Teresa > > rsc _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox