From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dX2hy-0002Sm-6h for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:52:56 +0000 Message-ID: <1500285149.6594.30.camel@pengutronix.de> From: Lucas Stach Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:52:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170707121000.GA16920@ravnborg.org> References: <20170707121000.GA16920@ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/23] at91: move reset vector to board code To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Barebox List Hi Sam, Am Freitag, den 07.07.2017, 14:10 +0200 schrieb Sam Ravnborg: > The following patchset moves the reset vector > for at91 boards from mach-at91 to board code. > This is similar to what other boards do and is done to > prepare for multi-image and DT support. > > The patchset convert all boards and thus clean up the > old code that resided in mach-at91/ > > The first patch have minimal impact, but prepares for a > board-by-board conversion. > All temporary CONFIG symbols are gone at the end of this series. > > I kept Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD and others > copyright in all the created files and did not add > copyright myself. The patchset does IMO not add any > copyrightable material from my side as this is > in reality just moving around code. > > The patchset was successfully booted on a AT91SAM9263EK, > and all defconfigs was built (expect the ones that failed > to build before this patchset was applied). > > Changes v1 => v2 > - converted all boards over > - fixed author info Just to let you know the current status here: While I think you are on the right track with this, I'm currently lacking the bandwidth to properly review this series. I'm a bit hesitant to just throw it into -next without any kind of review, so I'm still hoping for others to take a look. Regards, Lucas _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox