From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dhtkR-0003DB-Qg for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:32:21 +0000 Message-ID: <1502872315.19806.0.camel@pengutronix.de> From: Lucas Stach Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:31:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87valnrk6z.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874ltanmak.fsf@gmail.com> <87valnrk6z.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Barebox and ext4 ? problems To: Holger Schurig Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi Holger, Am Mittwoch, den 16.08.2017, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Holger Schurig: > Simon Aittamaa writes: > > > I think it was metadata_csum and 64bit... > > You're right. > > My SDCard was formatted months ago, I only used rsync for the updates. > But the eMMC was formatted afresh by a script from me. I found out with > the feature command "debugfs" that the partitions have different > features enables. In my case it was only 64bit, not metadata_csum. > > I now use > > mkfs.ext4 -O ^64bit -F -j -L $label /dev/mmcblk0p$partition > > to format it. It spits out some ugly warning that 64bit is the best > thing since sliced bread, but if you ignore this, then everything is > fine! > > To get rid of this uglyness, I use: > > mkfs.ext4 -O ^64bit -F -j -L $label /dev/mmcblk0p$partition | \ > grep -v 64-bit | \ > grep -v 64bit > > I think I'll post a patch to Barebox that either allows it to mount > partions with the 64bit feature. Or to refuse the mount with a proper > error message. That would be much appreciated. Regards, Lucas _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox