From: Robert Karszniewicz <r.karszniewicz@phytec.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] test: usb: storage: Increase retries for usb_stor_transport()
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:07:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1572019639-343291-1-git-send-email-r.karszniewicz@phytec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1572018968-343065-1-git-send-email-r.karszniewicz@phytec.de>
This should make writing and reading more reliable.
Also:
- change loop condition to make "retries" semantically correct
- add a debug message in case of fatal failure
---
And here is the test for how many retries were required at maximum. In case
anyone wants to try for themselves.
barebox:/ usb && mkdir /mnt/usb && mount /dev/disk0.0 /mnt/usb && echo 'generating 100MiB file' && memcpy -s /dev/prng -d testfile 0x0 0x0 104857600 && echo 'writing file to drive' && cp testfile /mnt/usb/testfile && md5sum testfile /mnt/usb/testfile; ls -l testfile /mnt/usb/testfile
The highest max_retries for our three drives was 4. So 10 should be high enough.
drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c b/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c
index 63d624e..90e4492 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c
@@ -86,9 +86,13 @@ static int usb_stor_transport(struct us_blk_dev *usb_blkdev,
struct us_data *us = usb_blkdev->us;
struct device_d *dev = &us->pusb_dev->dev;
int i, ret;
+ static int max_retries = 0;
-
- for (i = 0; i < retries; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i <= retries; i++) {
+ if (cmd[0] == SCSI_WRITE10 && i > max_retries) {
+ max_retries = i;
+ printf("max_retries = %d\n", max_retries);
+ }
dev_dbg(dev, "%s\n", usb_stor_opcode_name(cmd[0]));
ret = us->transport(usb_blkdev, cmd, cmdlen, data, datalen);
dev_dbg(dev, "%s returns %d\n", usb_stor_opcode_name(cmd[0]),
@@ -105,6 +109,8 @@ static int usb_stor_transport(struct us_blk_dev *usb_blkdev,
mdelay(request_sense_delay_ms);
}
+ dev_dbg(dev, "Retried %s %d times, and failed.\n", usb_stor_opcode_name(cmd[0]), retries);
+
return -EIO;
}
@@ -194,7 +200,7 @@ static int usb_stor_io_10(struct us_blk_dev *usb_blkdev, u8 opcode,
put_unaligned_be16(blocks, &cmd[7]);
return usb_stor_transport(usb_blkdev, cmd, sizeof(cmd), data,
- blocks * SECTOR_SIZE, 2, 0);
+ blocks * SECTOR_SIZE, 100, 0);
}
/***********************************************************************
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-25 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 15:56 [PATCH] " Robert Karszniewicz
2019-10-25 16:07 ` Robert Karszniewicz [this message]
2019-11-04 9:42 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-11-04 14:52 ` Robert Karszniewicz
2019-11-04 14:54 ` Marco Felsch
2019-11-04 14:59 ` Robert Karszniewicz
2019-11-04 15:21 ` Marco Felsch
2019-11-04 15:28 ` Robert Karszniewicz
2019-11-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Robert Karszniewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1572019639-343291-1-git-send-email-r.karszniewicz@phytec.de \
--to=r.karszniewicz@phytec.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox