From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:53:30 +0200 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uA48A-000mt0-1r for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:53:30 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uA48A-0007cm-1o for lore@pengutronix.de; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:53:30 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To: From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=YCSa49OVYLGwrqh0gItN9uqG1qzue0wNvlqnZ+F1KOU=; b=FEPWkTY5INcWy+jCaN4oq2z5oF GKSxZDDbD8eyaSmb3Pel7uAE9tZn/AzEkjf+1ct4qP9iGM8vow0TBlRgEf6wPG1OYlhunU1KUNyKL KT0TthyDT4YO/3vN8cIzm0kYn3ZbI9tGcJjJpWl61mSxnLVMZiJIPBQfy4rZEJH+hb38B8cFl9gil Q8H1KrwVj6UbSPfKrU+oV6Y++/NTC+ZqU/n9uCD1dONDFEhQA8rGWFJ0SDhvJFpBBTaUPDvzdyhJU +ailJzAqS+yZEMf67TFE8zKIhdE2iK2tDkpNcRWcQ8zxSkoetWe4m8kjkTSSywJfqmRf5xQEC5DMj 9Vda2u+w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uA47i-0000000CRPm-3k5l; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:53:02 +0000 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uA3oO-0000000CNYh-2HNg for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:33:05 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uA3oN-0007P0-Ch; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:33:03 +0200 Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uA3oN-000PK7-0e; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:33:03 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uA3oN-00E4YY-0R; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:33:03 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Alexander Shiyan In-Reply-To: <20250428092506.27200-1-eagle.alexander923@gmail.com> References: <20250428092506.27200-1-eagle.alexander923@gmail.com> Message-Id: <174600558313.3354053.13596004948154076723.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:33:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250430_023304_582205_438B5709 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.39 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Fix incorrect rate comparison in clk_set_rate() X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:25:06 +0300, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > The original condition in clk_set_rate() compared the current clock rate > against clk_round_rate(clk, rate). However, when the clock driver doesn't > implement .round_rate(), clk_round_rate() falls back to returning the > current clock rate via clk_get_rate(). This created a situation where: > clk_get_rate(clk) == clk_round_rate(clk, rate) > would always evaluate to true when .round_rate() is unimplemented. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] clk: Fix incorrect rate comparison in clk_set_rate() https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=3111d62b3174 (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer