[PATCH] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints

[PATCH] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints

[Ahmad Fatoum]

printf: use printf instead of printk in no_printk

The original commit was decoupling them a bit to allow for implementing
a printk with Linux semantics. This also requires us that no_printf has
no dependency on printk, but that was missed. Add that now.

Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
 include/printf.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/printf.h b/include/printf.h
index 58793bc067dc..3503b72c9e5e 100644
--- a/include/printf.h
+++ b/include/printf.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void __noreturn panic_no_stacktrace(const char *fmt, ...) __printf(1, 2);
 #define no_printf(fmt, ...)				\
 ({							\
 	if (0)						\
-		printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);		\
+		printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);		\
 	0;						\
 })
 
-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints

[Sascha Hauer]

On Mon, 08 Dec 2025 11:32:35 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> printf: use printf instead of printk in no_printk
> 
> The original commit was decoupling them a bit to allow for implementing
> a printk with Linux semantics. This also requires us that no_printf has
> no dependency on printk, but that was missed. Add that now.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints
      https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=e5a7137b3d1b (link may not be stable)

Best regards,
-- 
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>