* [PATCH] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints
@ 2025-12-08 10:32 Ahmad Fatoum
2025-12-08 12:12 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2025-12-08 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox; +Cc: Ahmad Fatoum
printf: use printf instead of printk in no_printk
The original commit was decoupling them a bit to allow for implementing
a printk with Linux semantics. This also requires us that no_printf has
no dependency on printk, but that was missed. Add that now.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
include/printf.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/printf.h b/include/printf.h
index 58793bc067dc..3503b72c9e5e 100644
--- a/include/printf.h
+++ b/include/printf.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void __noreturn panic_no_stacktrace(const char *fmt, ...) __printf(1, 2);
#define no_printf(fmt, ...) \
({ \
if (0) \
- printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
0; \
})
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-08 12:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-08 10:32 [PATCH] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints Ahmad Fatoum
2025-12-08 12:12 ` Sascha Hauer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox