From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:43:22 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wr7vt-0067VO-2P for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:43:22 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3058F2006CF for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:43:22 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=4gJjgpxo; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org"; dmarc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To: From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=57/txLH/Y1TELO9RYRpHc8U50daj7JN50KhgjJG6YMs=; b=4gJjgpxoDDa3PkObOUgO+cMYt+ g4LX+HDfz+j7I0Vpv8kfPj/C2MApRQRu7zcyCoBFMq39HpwYLr4BebXvXjxTypL3G97Fw/VW8IpKx ajyjdGL3ZF29fQTQiPF9RUes7hgSniPbL0V+2unFp3coSMpXPJNSeZPzSsvWUG4ngV1zx93+XzZd3 XgIefvkAGbcTqAB3qKHWXUmwrkSKSQuwTUwmreLBFyZtNtqMEcZvzzF0O0r0iXtViSBP2stn/sZnd NhxYL8A/bzaYLq6ALc39XSV8cCYW0Vb1iCIOWqyaf1mwMeSTp4V+G0uXs4ZqlZKK19VF0ZZ9xWS6x dutv8/Sg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wr7vf-000000013pO-0UUn; Tue, 04 Aug 2026 05:43:07 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wr7vb-000000013oh-3QDV for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2026 05:43:05 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de (drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) (Authenticated sender: relay-from-drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B81B4200082; Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:43:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wr7vZ-002oYI-28; Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:43:01 +0200 Received: from [::1] (helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wr7vZ-00000003Zq6-2VM3; Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:43:01 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: BAREBOX , Sascha Hauer In-Reply-To: <20260727-pbl-sha256-v2-0-5f5a16d614ca@pengutronix.de> References: <20260727-pbl-sha256-v2-0-5f5a16d614ca@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PBL: add support for optimized sha256 Message-Id: <178582218159.852711.15144772073511936485.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:43:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260803_224304_028058_1F30E358 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.30 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 14:59:43 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > When chainloading a full barebox from the PBL we have to verify the > loaded image with sha256. This can take some time for bigger image, so [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.71 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.40)[2607:7c80:54:3::133:from,2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28:received]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2:received]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3058F2006CF X-Stat-Signature: qz9jtmw5pfx7gegj8rpmu9xo4yen6p8n On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 14:59:43 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > When chainloading a full barebox from the PBL we have to verify the > loaded image with sha256. This can take some time for bigger image, so > add support for optimized implementations and ad the ARM64 Crypto > Extensions as a first implementation > > Applied, thanks! [1/2] PBL: add pbl_sha256() https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=82db922f5403 (link may not be stable) [2/2] ARM: pbl: add PBL support for crypto extensions https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=bd2e1febf170 (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer