From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:08:45 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wrxq0-000BdZ-1Y for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:08:45 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 097062020FE for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:08:41 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=UtIRQAl1; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org"; dmarc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To: From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ieFzkdZ3xxTt7WYk0UbQKRf4Tfj0f0Z0Dyb3FlYIa8c=; b=UtIRQAl1z0Xq3ZyJSISNCjWvxL +KgwEkSs1oswfDZ9mhIb9xRWo4r916ki+vL5jqQrt9tcFMzcSv1svHJhsW8nKkjRPebRAc9gem7Vf OUFRd0/eLG/lpSZRzWFJiKyutCh9YwT6o69v2ga/5KKjXqfgOEgE43HBRIyxFt089M8erEKpBj5No FDd8u6GfChgzXwC55b75JkJ6GBqGEo8IVdozQBODvVeMIPvr8GHDGjJ6y9vSz9wHv86Pu1sZYJECO dwUBspG3wK4y+wvGTS1m5D8EY6lA78zdag5GNsD0yubbH3GjLYy3PUpt+1hfk+XV5aBm/P/sXHdXV yI+XNxCg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wrxoa-00000005qsG-1Pvh; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:07:16 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wrxoW-00000005qrv-1V5G for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:07:14 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de (drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) (Authenticated sender: relay-from-drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEE45201FAA; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:07:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wrxoP-00065E-2h; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:07:05 +0200 Received: from [::1] (helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wrxoP-00000009Mf2-3Hk3; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:07:05 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum In-Reply-To: <20260806110658.3761972-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> References: <20260806110658.3761972-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: payload: gracefully handle OOM in initrd allocation Message-Id: <178602162578.2230182.3946651143555991502.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:07:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260806_060712_550184_931E4807 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 4.80 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:06:55 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > An initrd can get quite big, so we should not assume that this an > infallible allocation and instead propagate any OOM error code. > > Applied, thanks! Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 097062020FE X-Stat-Signature: peq714m5eou88mh87yy4d95khpzb8azq X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.71 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; KNOWN_LIST_ID(-1.00)[barebox.lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.40)[2607:7c80:54:3::133:from,2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28:received]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2:received]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action On Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:06:55 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > An initrd can get quite big, so we should not assume that this an > infallible allocation and instead propagate any OOM error code. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] efi: payload: gracefully handle OOM in initrd allocation https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=4ca87477ca95 (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer