From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:50:24 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wyrXi-0075Ve-2n for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:50:24 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AB482024A1 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:50:19 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=a1mKMgz4; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org"; dmarc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To: From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=mJ1vuTQwdRkColJAlO3papGP3CubKx/uiXWD+OSR0r0=; b=a1mKMgz456Y4YjTU28DWoIMz04 3VeNzWcj+F1k8BNJ6foLA11zGMq4Oi3lncicNMS+FXmih3kHjCYdQMripOu1nT12Qtg36mA+suYnY hjO7CQDlFWaTqPpnhA0Ob20cvdJDtOf3QIsPvTxjAjOgoU/kbP8jQvikgU7tgrmKbPYaKy2SaTJeN aQsrU9nCKbNkGMdHy+mI4EQouw2JbdZTPjNnq+wquQdkylAclSbkwqLxgDHnB/2x6Il6aC3+lXH9q 3YrScmjPO+rj/d+SI9WkXRJc8v1V31r3OcH2DH54rpdmFHCN/q99Z6uAyniiWsedMntak04HBGyIM Rngd6TwA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wyrWp-00000000txV-0tp2; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 13:49:27 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wyrWl-00000000twa-1tJs for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 13:49:25 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de (drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) (Authenticated sender: relay-from-drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B7B620248F; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:49:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wyrWf-003HbW-1g; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:49:17 +0200 Received: from [::1] (helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wyrWf-00000002qCo-1tvA; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:49:17 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum In-Reply-To: <20260806110658.3761972-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> References: <20260806110658.3761972-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: payload: gracefully handle OOM in initrd allocation Message-Id: <178766575745.677163.3863336111186854280.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:49:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260825_064923_649470_54EE57A2 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.05 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:06:55 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > An initrd can get quite big, so we should not assume that this an > infallible allocation and instead propagate any OOM error code. > > Applied, thanks! Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6AB482024A1 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-57.71 / 15.00]; RECEIVED_AUTHENTICATED_BY_MX1(-50.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; KNOWN_LIST_ID(-1.00)[barebox.lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.40)[2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28:received,2607:7c80:54:3::133:from]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2:received]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Stat-Signature: cte1jn14cktp737cw46jaj89hdyqr4kx On Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:06:55 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > An initrd can get quite big, so we should not assume that this an > infallible allocation and instead propagate any OOM error code. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] efi: payload: gracefully handle OOM in initrd allocation https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=71b370e3adb1 (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer