From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:10:49 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x0wAK-009Bs2-0d for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:10:49 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A2AA201A9D for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:10:48 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=xtmn8hPn; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org"; dmarc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To: From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=oKhSlrjJ+MZ65Z4sfoQsO4mr6jb3VFeKuXPohSK4FOg=; b=xtmn8hPnFT3GHn3j+vSf3PHQrl qLY7hcIrh8fhDk+ig54VP9UmpP+0ThkStFUXhbz//FivORHAohiWIQh97dNqUDKYdTO1GTvDgLgHr s/z3c2TD85d1VomRPM6R80JJiLVXLATLxZDTdoo9pY9Ytq6HvD1avk6NkL+0TWtla0jWeJbN5uDwE /2XgvQRck2oAWPycXpzoAdXk+3gNbw4up3BkP9UCfKnWKQGWB0DaWZc6g+iHL+y83SarRwSTvjp58 CYMP5UOTVj+edrq7g7wG8TnMR8VPe9et1zMLRxsF0n6PJ2SpzkvFLCeVWGphpM8NKjczX4YCRIEOX 3xVEJ5Qw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x0w9s-00000008gj3-0QSt; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 07:10:20 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x0w9q-00000008gil-0UpH for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 07:10:19 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de (drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) (Authenticated sender: relay-from-drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67A97201CCC; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:10:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x0w9o-004D7u-15; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:10:16 +0200 Received: from [::1] (helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x0w9o-00000000VaP-18UA; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:10:16 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum In-Reply-To: <20260828192715.1669104-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> References: <20260828192715.1669104-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixup! ARM: always call cache_invalidate_stale before enabling D-Cache Message-Id: <178816021626.121306.11824601609041878498.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:10:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260831_001018_314357_A3B75B0C X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.02 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, 28 Aug 2026 21:27:08 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > The invalidate was removed from __barebox_arm_entry, so it precedes MMU > setup. This was missed for ARM64 and it happened even when the MMU [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Stat-Signature: i7g1rc5jtjo8bp48bikdae8dac5mjnxu X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8A2AA201A9D X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-57.81 / 15.00]; RECEIVED_AUTHENTICATED_BY_MX1(-50.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; KNOWN_LIST_ID(-1.00)[barebox.lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.60)[2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2:received,2607:7c80:54:3::133:from,2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28:received]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_EXCLAIM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action On Fri, 28 Aug 2026 21:27:08 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > The invalidate was removed from __barebox_arm_entry, so it precedes MMU > setup. This was missed for ARM64 and it happened even when the MMU was > already enabled. > > Additionally, the invalidate was done even if MMU was already enabled. > We have this check for barebox as EFI payload, where we shouldn't really > do any cache maintenance ourselves, so move it after the check. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] fixup! ARM: always call cache_invalidate_stale before enabling D-Cache https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=0c88df132f66 (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer