From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from vsmx009.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net ([153.92.174.87]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1eorkN-0007DA-FG for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:21:21 +0000 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:20:57 +0100 (CET) From: Giorgio Dal Molin Message-ID: <1846760146.2938.1519309257312@mail.vodafone.de> In-Reply-To: <20180222080357.7ces7vlsip6gnmxs@pengutronix.de> References: <20180222080357.7ces7vlsip6gnmxs@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: autotools for barebox host/target tools? To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi, I have some experience with the gnu autotools. Could you specify which tools you are thinking about ? An alternative to the gnu autotools could also be 'meson'. giorgio > On February 22, 2018 at 9:03 AM Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I was just thinking, the kernel build system is great for compiling > barebox itself, but for compiling the userspace host and target tools > autotools would be a better match as they much better allow to specify > the necessary compilers and to pull the necessary dependencies in. > Any opinions or even volunteers? > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox