mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 33/34] ARM: mmu32: Skip reserved ranges during initialization
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 16:43:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1caed1b5-108d-7686-4e3b-0fd3bab04a58@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230517090340.3954615-34-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

On 17.05.23 11:03, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The early MMU code now uses pages to map the OP-TEE area non executable.
> This mapping is overwritten with sections in barebox proper. Refrain
> from doing so by using arch_remap_range() and bypassing reserved areas.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c
> index 705d27a045..47711bed35 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c
> @@ -522,9 +522,17 @@ void __mmu_init(bool mmu_on)
>  	vectors_init();

Took me a while to parse the below code, so I think a comment may be apt:

/*
 * Early mmu init will have mapped everything but the initial memory area
 * (excluding final OPTEE_SIZE bytes) uncached. We have now discovered
 * all memory banks, so let's map all pages, excluding reserved memory areas,
 * cacheable and executable.
 */

>  
>  	for_each_memory_bank(bank) {
> -		create_sections(bank->start, bank->start + bank->size - 1,
> -				PMD_SECT_DEF_CACHED);
> -		__mmu_cache_flush();
> +		struct resource *rsv;
> +		resource_size_t pos;
> +
> +		pos = bank->start;
> +
> +		for_each_reserved_region(bank, rsv) {
> +			arch_remap_range((void *)pos, rsv->start - pos, MAP_CACHED);
> +			pos = rsv->end + 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		arch_remap_range((void *)pos, bank->start + bank->size - pos, MAP_CACHED);

I am a bit bothered by the asymmetry here: Reserved regions in the extra memory banks
will be initially uncached (because outside initmem), so this loop does the correct thing.

For reserved regions within the initial memory, only the OP-TEE region would be uncached,
everything else would just be requested, but is still mapped cacheable.

IMO, that's surprising behavior.

Cheers,
Ahmad

>  	}
>  }
>  

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |




  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-17 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-17  9:03 [PATCH v2 00/34] ARM: MMU rework Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] ARM: remove unused membase argument Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:45   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] ARM: remove unused define Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:45   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] ARM: rename __arm_mem_scratch to arm_mem_scratch Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:46   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] ARM: put scratch mem area below OP-TEE Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:48   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 13:14     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 15:50       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] ARM: add arm_mem_optee() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:53   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] ARM: make arm_mem_scratch() a static inline function Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:53   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] ARM: define stack base consistently Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:55   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] ARM: move arm_mem_scratch_get() lower for consistency Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:57   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] ARM: drop cache function initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] ARM: Add _32 suffix to aarch32 specific filenames Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] ARM: cpu.c: remove unused include Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] ARM: mmu-common.c: use common mmu include Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] ARM: mmu32: rename mmu.h to mmu_32.h Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] ARM: mmu: implement MAP_FAULT Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] ARM: mmu64: Use arch_remap_range where possible Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] ARM: mmu32: implement zero_page_*() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] ARM: i.MX: Drop HAB workaround Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:01   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] ARM: Move early MMU after malloc initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] ARM: mmu: move dma_sync_single_for_device to extra file Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] ARM: mmu: merge mmu-early_xx.c into mmu_xx.c Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] ARM: mmu: alloc 64k for early page tables Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:03   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] ARM: mmu32: create alloc_pte() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:07   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] ARM: mmu64: " Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:15   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 13:17   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] ARM: mmu: drop ttb argument Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:23   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] ARM: mmu: always do MMU initialization early when MMU is enabled Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:29   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] ARM: mmu32: Assume MMU is on Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:36   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] ARM: mmu32: Fix pmd_flags_to_pte() for ARMv4/5/6 Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:39   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] ARM: mmu32: Add pte_flags_to_pmd() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:43   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 14:44     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] ARM: mmu32: add get_pte_flags, get_pmd_flags Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:46   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] ARM: mmu32: move functions into c file Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:48   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] ARM: mmu32: read TTB value from register Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:58   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 14:39     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-19  6:53       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-19  7:44         ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-19  7:52           ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] ARM: mmu32: Use pages for early MMU setup Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 14:21   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-22  8:14     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] ARM: mmu32: Skip reserved ranges during initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 14:43   ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2023-05-17 14:55     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 15:56       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] ARM: mmu64: Use two level pagetables in early code Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1caed1b5-108d-7686-4e3b-0fd3bab04a58@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox