From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Cc: "U-Boot Version 2 (barebox)" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: the "CONFIG_" namespace and what's with "CFG_CMD_" prefixes?
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:01:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091221100115.GU15126@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912200859330.20718@localhost>
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 09:06:07AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> based on some scanning i just did, i notice the following
> occurrences of the "CMD_CFG_" prefix on a number of preprocessor
> variables:
>
> $ grep -r CFG_CMD *
> arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/interrupts.c:#if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_IRQ)
> arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/ide.c:#ifdef CFG_CMD_IDE
> arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/ide.c:#endif /* CFG_CMD_IDE */
This file can be removed (and taken again from U-Boot if we want to add
ide support for barebox)
> arch/ppc/lib/kgdb.c:#endif /* CFG_CMD_KGDB */
> board/pcm030/pcm030.c:#if defined (CFG_CMD_IDE) && defined (CONFIG_IDE_RESET)
> board/pcm030/pcm030.c:#endif /* defined (CFG_CMD_IDE) && defined (CONFIG_IDE_RESET) */
unused code. I just created a patch to remove it.
> commands/loads.c:# if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_SAVES)
> commands/loads.c:# endif /* CFG_CMD_SAVES */
> commands/loads.c:#if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_SAVES)
> commands/loads.c:# endif /* CFG_CMD_SAVES */
> commands/loads.c:#if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_SAVES)
> commands/loads.c:#endif /* CFG_CMD_SAVES */
commands/loads.c hasn't been touched for ages and won't even compile. If
somebody wants to add loads support he should start from scratch or with
original U-Boot code. When I started with U-Boot-V2 or now barebox there
was much old code and some of it is still there. I think we can safely
remove code which obviously wasn't touched for long time and still looks
like U-Boot. The original U-Boot code is still there for reference and
as a base to do a fresh start.
> common/Kconfig: automatically enabled when you select CFG_CMD_DATE .
> drivers/net/at91_ether.c:#if defined(CONFIG_MII) || (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_MII)
> drivers/net/at91_ether.c:#endif /* defined(CONFIG_MII) || (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_MII) */
> drivers/net/at91_ether.c:#if defined(CONFIG_MII) || (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_MII)
The CFG_CMD_MII part can be removed here.
> lib/crc32.c:#include <common.h> /* to get command definitions like CFG_CMD_JFFS2 */
This comment is obsolete
> $
>
> it's not clear what that prefix is supposed to represent since, in
> at least one case, it might be a typo -- "CMD_SAVES":
>
> $ grep -r CMD_SAVES *
> commands/loads.c:# if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_SAVES)
> commands/loads.c:# endif /* CFG_CMD_SAVES */
> commands/loads.c:#if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_SAVES)
> commands/loads.c:# endif /* CFG_CMD_SAVES */
> commands/loads.c:#if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_SAVES)
> commands/loads.c:#endif /* CFG_CMD_SAVES */
> commands/Kconfig:config CMD_SAVES
> $
>
> if those tests are meant to match that Kconfig variable, then
> obviously they're misspelled. if not, then i'm not sure what's going
> on. where *are* CFG_CMD_ variables supposed to be defined? as in:
>
> $ grep -rw CFG_CMD_MII *
> drivers/net/at91_ether.c:#if defined(CONFIG_MII) || (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_MII)
> drivers/net/at91_ether.c:#endif /* defined(CONFIG_MII) || (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_MII) */
> drivers/net/at91_ether.c:#if defined(CONFIG_MII) || (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_MII)
> $
>
> as a final point, it's standard practise that the "CONFIG_"-prefixed
> variable namespace should be reserved *exclusively* for Kconfig
> variables. at least that's the way it works in the kernel world.
Ack.
As a general note all CFG_CMD_ variables are leftovers from original
U-Boot code and should be either converted to Kconfig variables or
removed if not needed.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-21 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-20 14:06 Robert P. J. Day
2009-12-21 10:01 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091221100115.GU15126@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox