From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1O3mUl-00024O-Cr for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:38:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:38:15 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Message-ID: <20100419083815.GA32752@pengutronix.de> References: <1271665698-23163-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1271665698-23163-7-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1271665698-23163-7-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] wip: fix possible error on overflow in is_timeout To: Wolfram Sang Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Marc Kleine-Budde Hello, On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:28:17AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > From: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig > = > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang I didn't signed-off that one, because I wanted to think about it. Marc thought it to be OK. Now I think it is. Can you please add my S-o-b and remove "wip:" from the subject? Thanks Uwe -- = Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox