From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2] S3C24xx: NAND management changes to support booting from NAND
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:40:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110307094002.GD8042@jasper.tkos.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201103071018.00650.jbe@pengutronix.de>
Hi Juergen,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:18:00AM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > This is revision two of my patch series to make the mini2440 booting from
> > NAND. This seems somehow tricky: The mini2440 with a 64 MiB NAND works fine
> > here, but the one with 128 MiB does currently boot only.
> > In the first patch series where some errors in page address calculation, so
> > they cannot work. This patch series might do it in a correct manner, but
> > now only tested on 64 MiB and 128 MiB NAND. At least booting from NAND is
> > now working also from 128 MiB. But the ECC handling fails, and I have no
> > idea whats wrong now: Reading the environment fails with 'err: -74'...
>
> Here the main question:
> - what is the difference in ECC handling in the S3C2440 CPU when using
> a "small page" or a "large page" NAND?
> "Small page" ECC seems to work, but "large page" ECC fails. Anyone here with
> more experience with S3C2440/NAND? The Linux driver works well on the large
> page NANDs, but not the barebox's one.
I don't have experience with the S3C2440 NAND controller, but I'm working on a
similar problem in the i.MX NAND controller Linux driver. NAND chips with 2k
page size work fine, but 4k devices fail in the kernel. The cause for this is
the wrong nand_ecclayout. In the i.MX case, the .eccpos table was too small
for the larger ECC table of the 4k devices. This caused a corruption of the
OOB data at the higher level of the NAND stack. Fixing this requires upgrade
to a newer kernel (I currently use 2.6.36).
As the nand_s3c2410 Barebox driver (like the kernel one) has only one
nand_ecclayout struct for the 512 bytes page size, this may be the cause of
your problem.
I hope this helps.
baruch
--
~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-07 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-06 21:53 Juergen Beisert
2011-03-06 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] mini2440: Add more info about possible SDRAM and flash devices Juergen Beisert
2011-03-06 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] mini2440: Consider correct NAND page size for boot Juergen Beisert
2011-03-06 21:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] S3C2440/NAND: Fix page address generation Juergen Beisert
2011-03-06 21:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] S3C2440/NAND: Re-enable the controller after NAND boot test Juergen Beisert
2011-03-06 21:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] S3C2440/NAND: Fix typo Juergen Beisert
2011-03-07 9:18 ` [RFC/PATCH v2] S3C24xx: NAND management changes to support booting from NAND Juergen Beisert
2011-03-07 9:40 ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2011-03-07 10:37 ` Juergen Beisert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110307094002.GD8042@jasper.tkos.co.il \
--to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jbe@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox