From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Q3vzY-0006g8-KJ for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:51:18 +0000 Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:51:12 +0200 From: Robert Schwebel Message-ID: <20110327195112.GU4626@pengutronix.de> References: <4D80C8AB.4040905@nextfour.com> <4D81D20E.3060803@eukrea.com> <4D8711C3.7050107@nextfour.com> <4D87A53A.1060903@tibbo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D87A53A.1060903@tibbo.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Atmel status To: Dvorkin Dmitry Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Dimitry, On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:21:30PM +0300, Dvorkin Dmitry wrote: > what is the status of the barebox for Atmel? Anyone tested it with > any SAM* devkits? Yes. > I see a big potential of barebox, I like it's structure and design > and I'm interested in sam9m10g45ek support. We have Barebox running on the G45 and on several other older AT91SAM9 chips. Note that not all features might be supported, but it boots :-) Best Regards, Robert Schwebel -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox