From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QdfVX-0005tE-8b for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:32:00 +0000 Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 11:31:55 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Message-ID: <20110704093155.GI4338@pengutronix.de> References: <20110704051347.GJ28000@game.jcrosoft.org> <20110704075925.GD4338@pengutronix.de> <20110704090853.GF4338@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110704090853.GF4338@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: mach-versatile: debug_ll.h licenc To: Alexey Zaytsev Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:08:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:58:34PM +0400, Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > > 2011/7/4 Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig : > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:13:47AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VI= LLARD wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 ./arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/debug_ll.h > > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Can you put this file under gpl v2 or later > > >> > > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Barebox is GPLv2 Only project > > > INAL, but I think this is not a problem. Barebox itself just doesn't > > > make use of the possibility to use a later version of the GPL. Still = you > > > can pick that file out of barebox and use it in a GPL v3 project. > > > > > > But maybe I just didn't get what you intended with your mail. > > = > > This is a problem. If some files are gpl 2 only, and others are gpl 3 > > only, you can't distribute the result, as the licenses are not > > compatible. > We're not talking about "gpl v3 only" (or "v3 or later") here. Including a > "v2 or later" header in a "v2 only" .c file should be no problem. Ah, OK, I misread Jean-Christophe's question "Can you put this file under gpl v2 or later" as "Is currently put under gpl v2 or later". Sorry for the noise, Uwe -- = Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox