Re: [PATCH 1/7] device: introduce resource structure to simplify resource declaration

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>]

On 17:40 Tue 19 Jul     , Antony Pavlov wrote:
> On 16/07/2011, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote:
> > and add multi resource per device support
> >
> > for now we keep the old map_base and size temporary but will switch all of
> > the used step by step to them resource way
> >
> > and mirror the first resource to the map_base and size if available
> >
> 
> > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> ...
> > +struct resource {
> > +	resource_size_t start;
> > +	resource_size_t size;
> > +	const char *name;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +};
> 
> In linux-2.6.39/include/linux/ioport.h:
> 
> struct resource {
>         resource_size_t start;
>         resource_size_t end;
>         const char *name;
>         unsigned long flags;
>         struct resource *parent, *sibling, *child;
> };
> 
> So there is incompatability: barebox has 'size' field, but linux  has
> 'end' field instead.
> 
> Can you comment this, please?
in barebox we use size no end in the resource since the begenning

so I choose to keep it this way

and avoid the calcul end - start

if u use helper resource_size() you will no notice

Best Regards,
J.

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox