From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QjQde-00065w-0K for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:52:15 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:51:59 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20110720065159.GQ20587@pengutronix.de> References: <1310994370-28444-1-git-send-email-antonynpavlov@gmail.com> <20110718210440.GK20587@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] debug_ll.h: add PUTS_LL() function To: Franck JULLIEN Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:14:03PM +0200, Franck JULLIEN wrote: > 2011/7/18 Sascha Hauer : > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 05:06:09PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov > > > > Applied both to next. > > > > Thanks > > =A0Sascha > > > >> --- > >> =A0include/debug_ll.h | =A0 13 +++++++++++++ > >> =A01 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/debug_ll.h b/include/debug_ll.h > >> index e99ae7d..6b1b174 100644 > >> --- a/include/debug_ll.h > >> +++ b/include/debug_ll.h > >> @@ -35,9 +35,22 @@ > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ch =3D ((v >> (= i*4)) & 0xf);\ > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ch +=3D (ch >= =3D 10) ? 'a' - 10 : '0';\ > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0PUTC_LL (ch); }= }) > >> + > >> +static __inline__ void PUTS_LL(char * str) > >> +{ > >> + =A0 =A0 while (*str) { > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if (*str =3D=3D '\n') { > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 PUTC_LL('\r'); > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 } > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 PUTC_LL(*str); > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 str++; > >> + =A0 =A0 } > >> +} > >> + > >> =A0#else > >> =A0# define PUTC_LL(c) do {} while (0) > >> =A0# define PUTHEX_LL(v) do {} while (0) > >> +# define PUTS_LL(c) do {} while (0) > >> > >> =A0#endif > >> > = > Is there any reason for not using vsprintf in a printf_ll function > which would use puts_ll / putc_ll ?? You would at least need a writable string buffer. I'd rather like to keep the ll functions as simple as possible. Otherwise you end up debugging the debug functions while hunting some lowlevel problem. Sascha -- = Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox