From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Re8hu-0002Z4-Ih for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:14:59 +0000 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:14:48 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20111223171448.GD27267@pengutronix.de> References: <1323945034-19687-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1323945034-19687-2-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20111218130742.GE7899@game.jcrosoft.org> <20111219103109.GJ27267@pengutronix.de> <20111220140321.GF7899@game.jcrosoft.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111220140321.GF7899@game.jcrosoft.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: *** PROBABLY SPAM *** [PATCH 01/12] oftree: add of_fix_tree() To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:03:21PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 11:31 Mon 19 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:07:42PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > HI, > > > > > > what is the impact on the binary size?? > > > > Don't know. Why should this have a great influence on binary size? > I mean the whole rework?? About +2k Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox