From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([2a01:e0c:1:1599::11]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RvRfD-0000pO-BY for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:55:46 +0000 Received: from eb-e6520 (unknown [82.240.38.71]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BD94B00EC for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:55:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:55:33 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= Message-ID: <20120209115533.02df9dd6@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: "panda" config and build doesn't work on panda ES at all To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi, Le Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:20:45 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" a =E9crit : > just for fun, i configured and built MLO and barebox.bin for the > panda, then tried to use that on a panda ES -- got no response > whatever from minicom. i did verify that i could boot to barebox just > fine on a regular panda, though. > = > this is different from the case of a regular beagle and beagle xM, > for which the MLO and barebox.bin boot just fine on an xM, so there's > clearly a significant difference between those two panda variants as > far as barebox is concerned. i haven't had any time to look at it in > more detail yet. > = Panda ES has a OMAP4460 @ 1.2GHz Panda has a OMAP4430 @ 1GHz. This patch series shows that some changes are really needed to switch from the 4430 to the 4460 : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-July/096351.html Eric -- = http://eukrea.com/en/news/104-2012 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox