mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* i.MX21 USB OTG
@ 2012-03-22 23:25 Derald D. Woods
  2012-03-23  8:36 ` Sascha Hauer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Derald D. Woods @ 2012-03-22 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: barebox

All,

I have an existing design that uses the i.MX21 ARM9 processor. The
design currently uses an external USB OTG chip. The chip is now
end-of-life. I know that this is an older ARM processor. It still meets
most of the design needs. Is the i.MX21 OTG functionality considered
reliable? I have not seen any real success stories with the i.MX21 USB
OTG implementation. Our board currently utilizes the USB OTG chip at
the bootloader and Linux kernel level.

I would appreciate being pointed in the right direction or warned of
impending danger.

I posted to this list because the support for i.MX2x processors is still
fairly active in the Barebox community.

 
Derald D. Woods


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAPhRStYbTCD6Lzhcfna4WRqYZhQRJrmiEyFm6egFovYdVso59g@mail.gmail.com>]

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-24 16:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-22 23:25 i.MX21 USB OTG Derald D. Woods
2012-03-23  8:36 ` Sascha Hauer
     [not found] <CAPhRStYbTCD6Lzhcfna4WRqYZhQRJrmiEyFm6egFovYdVso59g@mail.gmail.com>
2012-03-24 14:10 ` Martin Fuzzey
2012-03-24 16:15   ` Derald D. Woods

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox