From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SFAfG-0001LG-SS for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:49:22 +0000 From: Juergen Beisert Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:48:44 +0200 References: <4F7B1221.2050907@gmail.com> <201204032045.37563.jbe@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201204032248.44260.jbe@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: S5PV210 CPU support To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Cc: Alexey Galakhov Alexey Galakhov wrote: > Juergen Beisert wrote: > > Alexey Galakhov wrote: > > > Does somebody work on support of Samsung S5PC1xx and/or S5PV210 SoC? > > > I'm just trying to port Barebox to Mini210/Tiny210 boards from > > > FrinedlyArm. > > > > This would be really interesting. I'm working on S3C6410 support (for the > > Mini6410), but progress is very slow due to lack of time. > > Can you please share any incomplete and/or non-working code you may > have, just for reference? This would help a lot. It seems that the > whole line of Samsung chips has many similar features, and I don't > like to reinvent the wheel. 'git://git.pengutronix.de/git/jbe/barebox.git' branch 's3c64xx_next' jbe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5128 | Vertretung Sued/Muenchen, Germany | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox