From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SUjB7-0001u5-8u for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 18:42:30 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 20:42:26 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Message-ID: <20120516184226.GO22395@pengutronix.de> References: <20120515192934.GM30400@pengutronix.de> <1337148616-13639-1-git-send-email-j.weitzel@phytec.de> <20120516112025.GR30400@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120516112025.GR30400@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramfs: rember last accessed chunk To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:20:25PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 08:10:16AM +0200, Jan Weitzel wrote: > > Writing big files takes longer and longer because of the chunk list > > By storing a pointer of the recent used chunk in the inode, access time= s are > > improved. > > Testet on with tftp 10M: > > OMAP4 chunk size 4096: 12244ms 8192: 4239ms > > patched 2647ms 2785ms > > i.MX35 chunk size 8192: 7225ms > > patched 2691ms > > = > > No impact on much smaller files seen > > = > > Signed-off-by: Jan Weitzel > = > Applied, thanks Don't know if it's already too late: $Subject ~=3D s/rember/remember/ Best regards Uwe -- = Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox