From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SXox8-0003Wf-Us for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 07:28:52 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:28:38 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20120525072838.GK30400@pengutronix.de> References: <1337889903-18638-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <20120524202510.GE30400@pengutronix.de> <20120524224640.291aabdd@eb-e6520> <20120525063411.GF30400@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i.MX25: fix eSDHC1 pads To: Roberto Nibali Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Roberto Nibali wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Sascha Hauer wro= te: > = > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:46:40PM +0200, Eric B=E9nard wrote: > > > Hi Sascha, > > > > > > Le Thu, 24 May 2012 22:25:10 +0200, > > > Sascha Hauer a =E9crit : > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:05:03PM +0200, Eric B=E9nard wrote: > > > > > enabling SION bit makes SDHC1 working on the i.MX25. > > > = > I am a bit surprised since in my case, SDHC1 worked out of the box, after > disabling all the iomux pad configuration settings. I believe sync'ing the > iomux with the kernel goes both with the philosophy of barebox and its > maintainability. > = > = > > > > Can we instead just sync the iomux file with the kernel? I think th= is > > > > > > OK will post the patch syncing barebox & kernel. > > > > > > > will make less problems in the longer run. At least as long the iom= ux > > > > files in the kernel still exist... > > > > > > > is iomux settings planned to be removed from the kernel ? > > > > I suppose when all i.MX are converted to devicetree and pinmux they will > > be removed. I don't know how long this will take though. > > > > > Has anybody started on the mx25 conversion to devicetree and pinmux yet? > Last time I checked at lot of other fsl cores had already been converted, > but not this one. Eric, have you tried moving to your mx25 to device tree > yet? I ported over the i.MX27 to devicetree (no pinmux though) and it turned out to be a fairly easy task, at least for the devices which are supported already due to the i.MX5/6 devicetree port. Sascha -- = Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox