mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH/master] ARM/MXS: pull-up and bitkeeper must be handled differently
@ 2012-07-20 13:34 Juergen Beisert
  2012-07-23 20:11 ` Sascha Hauer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Beisert @ 2012-07-20 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: barebox

Since commit 2f6b1f7690640f571f8e72fc2f2564acb2e13778 the pull-up and
bitkeeper handling for i.MX23/28 is correct. But now it is important to
distinguish these pin features as their programmed bit values are different.
With this patch the bitkeeper and pull-up enable/disable bits are now handled
separately.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx23.h b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx23.h
index 7b2883c..82362d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx23.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx23.h
@@ -22,13 +22,14 @@
  *                          ^^^^____ Bit offset
  *                        ^^________ Function
  *                       ^__________ Drive strength feature present
- *                      ^___________ Pull up / bit keeper present
+ *                      ^___________ Pull up present
  *                    ^^____________ Drive strength setting
  *                   ^______________ Pull up / bit keeper setting
  *                  ^_______________ Voltage select present
  *                 ^________________ Voltage selection
  *             ^____________________ direction if enabled as GPIO (1 = output)
  *            ^_____________________ initial output value if enabled as GPIO and configured as output
+ *           ^______________________ Bit keeper present
  */
 #ifndef __ASM_MACH_IOMUX_H
 #define __ASM_MACH_IOMUX_H
@@ -63,7 +64,7 @@
 
 /* control pad's pull up / bit keeper feature */
 #define PE (1 << 10)
-#define BK (1 << 11)	/* FIXME useful to distinguish? */
+#define BK (1 << 21)
 #define PE_PRESENT(x) (!!((x) & PE))
 #define BK_PRESENT(x) (!!((x) & BK))
 #define PULLUP(x) ((x) << 13)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx28.h b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx28.h
index ea1c3d8..82918cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx28.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx28.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
  *                         ^^^______ Register Number
  *                       ^^_________ Function
  *                      ^___________ Drive strength feature present
- *                     ^____________ Pull up / bit keeper present
+ *                     ^____________ Pull up present
  *                   ^^_____________ Drive strength setting
  *                  ^_______________ Pull up / bit keeper setting
  *                 ^________________ Voltage select present
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
  *            ^_____________________ direction if enabled as GPIO (1 = output)
  *           ^______________________ initial output value if enabled as GPIO
  *                                   and configured as output
+ *          ^_______________________ Bit keeper present
  */
 #ifndef __MACH_IOMUX_IMX28_H
 #define __MACH_IOMUX_IMX28_H
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@
 
 /* control pad's pull up / bit keeper feature */
 #define PE (1 << 11)
-#define BK (1 << 11)	/* FIXME useful to distinguish? */
+#define BK (1 << 22)
 #define PE_PRESENT(x) (!!((x) & PE))
 #define BK_PRESENT(x) (!!((x) & BK))
 #define PULLUP(x) ((x) << 14)

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                              | Juergen Beisert             |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry      | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH/master] ARM/MXS: pull-up and bitkeeper must be handled differently
  2012-07-20 13:34 [PATCH/master] ARM/MXS: pull-up and bitkeeper must be handled differently Juergen Beisert
@ 2012-07-23 20:11 ` Sascha Hauer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2012-07-23 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juergen Beisert; +Cc: barebox

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:34:49PM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> Since commit 2f6b1f7690640f571f8e72fc2f2564acb2e13778 the pull-up and
> bitkeeper handling for i.MX23/28 is correct. But now it is important to
> distinguish these pin features as their programmed bit values are different.
> With this patch the bitkeeper and pull-up enable/disable bits are now handled
> separately.
> 

Applied, thanks

 Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-23 20:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-20 13:34 [PATCH/master] ARM/MXS: pull-up and bitkeeper must be handled differently Juergen Beisert
2012-07-23 20:11 ` Sascha Hauer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox