From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SwFvZ-0004HT-Eq for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:08:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:07:42 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20120731170742.GA30009@pengutronix.de> References: <50170C6A.2000101@erwinrol.com> <5017B839.7070806@erwinrol.com> <20120731131319.GY30009@pengutronix.de> <5017F6CA.1040308@erwinrol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5017F6CA.1040308@erwinrol.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: x86 weirdness To: Erwin Rol Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:16:26PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > Hey Sascha, > > > There seem to be two memset calls, that could be problematic. Both > should be easily replaceable with for-loops (like I already did by > the first). > > We just have to be very careful to not call any functions from > outside the boot dir (expect for the main barebox entry point). This is probably a good idea anyway since the bss is not cleared at this stage. > > Don't you love the weird x86 world :-) I'm glad that most of the time I don't have to care about x86 ;) Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox