From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1THexA-0005cK-1H for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:06:21 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:06:18 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20120928180618.GK1322@pengutronix.de> References: <20120913172220.GB20834@game.jcrosoft.org> <1347558023-25680-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1347558023-25680-7-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <20120928104846.GI24458@pengutronix.de> <20120928154801.GK26553@game.jcrosoft.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120928154801.GK26553@game.jcrosoft.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] defaultenv-2: add boot sequence To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:48:01PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 12:48 Fri 28 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > boot [method]: If called without method, it will iterate over > > /env/boot.d/*. If that directory does not exist, > > it will fall back to a single boot source, which you > > haven't specified, so the script will complain. If you > > give [method], that will be one of /env/boot/[method] > > or /env/boot.d/[method]. If [method] exists in both > > directories, the behaviour will be unspecified. > This was your request to do this this way Whatever I said, until recently I haven't even noticed that this script recursively calls itself. I also did not realize that this script intermixed two completely different things with 10 lines boot sequence, 10 lines not and then 10 lines maybe boot sequence. > > THe first version was keeping the old boot.default and ask you to enable the > boot sequence specifycally and then you ask me to drop this to make the boot > sequence by default > > so now I've hardware ready to be send on the way with this next with boot > sequence mandatory The -next branch is explicitly declared non stable. You shouldn't ship prerelease software and expect that it doesn't change. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox