From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 1.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net ([188.165.57.91] helo=mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1THhyR-0001Gp-4n for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:19:52 +0000 Received: from mail98.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 98E75FFA49D for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:25:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:17:18 +0200 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Message-ID: <20120928211718.GM26553@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <20120913172220.GB20834@game.jcrosoft.org> <1347558023-25680-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1347558023-25680-7-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <20120928104846.GI24458@pengutronix.de> <20120928154801.GK26553@game.jcrosoft.org> <20120928180618.GK1322@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120928180618.GK1322@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] defaultenv-2: add boot sequence To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On 20:06 Fri 28 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:48:01PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 12:48 Fri 28 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > > boot [method]: If called without method, it will iterate over > > > /env/boot.d/*. If that directory does not exist, > > > it will fall back to a single boot source, which you > > > haven't specified, so the script will complain. If you > > > give [method], that will be one of /env/boot/[method] > > > or /env/boot.d/[method]. If [method] exists in both > > > directories, the behaviour will be unspecified. > > This was your request to do this this way > > Whatever I said, until recently I haven't even noticed that > this script recursively calls itself. I also did not realize > that this script intermixed two completely different things with > 10 lines boot sequence, 10 lines not and then 10 lines maybe boot > sequence. > > > > > THe first version was keeping the old boot.default and ask you to enable the > > boot sequence specifycally and then you ask me to drop this to make the boot > > sequence by default > > > > so now I've hardware ready to be send on the way with this next with boot > > sequence mandatory > > The -next branch is explicitly declared non stable. You shouldn't ship > prerelease software and expect that it doesn't change. with the tag next-stable expect so we need to put some rules so the next does not end up with a I apply but will see if used specially 6 days to the release Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox