From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TNf5E-0002Jf-MT for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:27:29 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:27:26 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20121015072726.GL27665@pengutronix.de> References: <1350260560-15528-1-git-send-email-vicencb@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1350260560-15528-1-git-send-email-vicencb@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] archosg9: improve support for tablet To: Vicente Bergas Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi vj, On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 02:22:34AM +0200, Vicente Bergas wrote: > This patch series solves/improves/implements: > ttyOxxx are 0 based, so change ttyO1 to ttyO0 > change speed to 115200, there are some issues at Mbaud speed in linux > make the archos environment more flexible: initrd and zImage names are overwritable > added definition of PSR_I_BIT and some others, remaining PSR bits renamed to match the linux ones > disable interrupts at barebox exit > speed up initrd transfer > cleaner voltage switching I applied up to 4/6. > > For the "OMAP4: clean voltage switch" patch I'm not sure if the changes are compatible with other boards. > > Vicente Bergas (6): > ArchosG9: changed serial port and env > ARM: add rename PSR bits to match linux names > ARM: ensure irqs are disabled at barebox exit > UIMAGE: improve transfer speed > ARM: use arm setup stack function on archosg9 This one has to wait for some time. Currently the branch containing the Archos patches does not have this function. I try to remember that I still have to apply it. > OMAP4: clean voltage switch I responded to that separately. BTW please try to add a bit more verbose commit messages next time. For example for the uImage patch it would have been interesting to know which workload is affected. Things like this will help us later when we wish to change the lines along the commit and we wish to know why they are there anyway. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox