mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Carlo Caione <carlo.caione@gmail.com>
Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:02:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121018070211.GO27665@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7273C8F9-F3BD-4606-8C35-B370AA04C98C@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:27:14AM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote:
> 
> On Oct 16, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:04:44PM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote:
> >> +
> >> +static struct clk ref_3_clk = {
> >> +	.rate = 3 * 1000 * 1000,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct clk ref_1_clk = {
> >> +	.rate = 1 * 1000 * 1000,
> >> +};
> > 
> > Add a 'select COMMON_CLK' to your Kconfig and do a:
> > 
> > 	clk_dummy = clk_fixed("dummy", 0);
> > 	clk_ref_3 = clk_fixed("ref3", 3 * 1000 * 1000);
> > 	clk_ref_1 = clk_fixed("ref1", 1 * 1000 * 1000);
> > 
> > Then you can drop your clk code and get a clk_dump command
> > which you can use to see what clocks you have.
> 
> RFC
> 
> ok I ask here before submitting the whole set because I'm not sure if this is a convenient solution.
> I'm not sure if you are suggesting to have two different clock definition one for clk_fixed and the other one for clkdev,
> so I was thinking something like:
> 
> enum brcm_clks {
> 	dummy, clk_ref_3, clk_ref_1, clks_max
> };
> 
> static struct clk *clks[clks_max];
> 
> int brmc_clk_create(struct clk *clk, const char *con_id, const char *dev_id)
> {
> 	struct clk_lookup *clkdev;
> 
> 	clkdev = clkdev_alloc(clk, con_id, dev_id);
> 	if (!clkdev)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
> 	clkdev_add(clkdev);
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> static int bcm2835_clk_init(void)
> {
> 	int ret; 
> 
> 	clks[dummy] = clk_fixed("dummy", 0);
> 	ret = brmc_clk_create(clks[dummy], "apb_pclk", NULL);
> 	if (ret)
> 		goto clk_err;
> 
> 	clks[clk_ref_3] = clk_fixed("ref3", 3 * 1000 * 1000);
> 	ret = brmc_clk_create(clks[clk_ref_3], NULL, "uart0-pl0110");
> 	if (ret)
> 		goto clk_err;
> 
> 	clks[clk_ref_1] = clk_fixed("ref1", 1 * 1000 * 1000);
> 	ret = brmc_clk_create(clks[clk_ref_1], NULL, "bcm2835-cs");
> 	if (ret)
> 		goto clk_err;

The above is basically what I was thinking of. The only thing I see that
this *looks* like there is exactly one lookup per clock. This indeed is
the case currenty here, but this does not have to be true. A clock may
have multiple lookups, for example the ref3 clk may also be used by the
lcd controller or something else. So I suggest to first register all
clocks and the lookups afterwards.

What you have as brmc_clk_create could well be a generic helper
function, it will be useful for others aswell.

BTW error checking here is a good idea, but a rollback of the allocated
resources will be unnecessary as you are doomed anyway when something
fails here.

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-16 18:04 [PATCH 0/5] BCM2835/Raspberry-Pi support Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] BCM2835: add clocksource driver Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] BCM2835: add gpio driver Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 21:09   ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM1176: add support Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch) Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 21:24   ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17  6:51     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-17  7:01       ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17  7:25         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-17  8:31           ` Carlo Caione
2012-10-17 21:00             ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 22:27     ` Carlo Caione
2012-10-18  7:02       ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] Raspberry-Pi: add support (board) Carlo Caione
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-18 19:42 [PATCH 0/5] BCM2835/Raspberry-Pi support Carlo Caione
2012-10-18 19:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch) Carlo Caione
2012-10-13 14:00 [PATCH 0/5] BCM2835/Raspberry-Pi support Carlo Caione
2012-10-13 14:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch) Carlo Caione
2012-10-13 11:22 [PATCH 0/5] BCM2835/Raspberry-Pi Carlo Caione
2012-10-13 11:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch) Carlo Caione

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121018070211.GO27665@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=carlo.caione@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox