From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/28] ARM at91sam926x: provide reset function for boards with lowlevel init
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:26:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121018072656.GB22418@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350507817-7819-3-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On 23:03 Wed 17 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Some Atmel boards use a reset() function provided by the architecture.
> Add a reset function for the board instead and call the architecture
> specific init function from there. While at it, test if we are running
> from SDRAM and skip the init function in this case. This makes the configs
> safe for both first and second stage.
no when using the lowlevel init ont at91 we are first stage so this can not
work at91_get_sdram_size can only known the ramsize after the lowlevle is done
Best Rebgards,
J.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/Makefile | 2 ++
> arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/lowlevel.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boards/pm9261/Makefile | 2 ++
> arch/arm/boards/pm9261/lowlevel.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boards/pm9263/Makefile | 2 ++
> arch/arm/boards/pm9263/lowlevel.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 4 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_lowlevel_init.c | 9 +++++++--
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h | 3 +++
> 10 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/lowlevel.c
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/pm9261/lowlevel.c
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/pm9263/lowlevel.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/Makefile b/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/Makefile
> index eb072c0..47ab803 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/Makefile
> @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> obj-y += init.o
> +obj-y += lowlevel.o
> +pbl-y += lowlevel.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/lowlevel.c b/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/lowlevel.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6050bcd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/lowlevel.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <init.h>
> +#include <sizes.h>
> +#include <asm/barebox-arm.h>
> +#include <asm/barebox-arm-head.h>
> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
> +#include <mach/board.h>
> +#include <mach/at91sam9_sdramc.h>
> +
> +void __naked __bare_init reset(void)
> +{
> + common_reset();
> +
> + at91sam926x_entry(AT91_SDRAM_BASE, at91_get_sdram_size());
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/pm9261/Makefile b/arch/arm/boards/pm9261/Makefile
> index eb072c0..47ab803 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boards/pm9261/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/pm9261/Makefile
> @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> obj-y += init.o
> +obj-y += lowlevel.o
> +pbl-y += lowlevel.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/pm9261/lowlevel.c b/arch/arm/boards/pm9261/lowlevel.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b8a8728
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/pm9261/lowlevel.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <init.h>
> +#include <sizes.h>
> +#include <asm/barebox-arm.h>
> +#include <asm/barebox-arm-head.h>
> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
> +#include <mach/board.h>
> +
> +void __naked __bare_init reset(void)
> +{
> + common_reset();
> +
> + at91sam926x_entry(AT91_SDRAM_BASE, SZ_64M);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/pm9263/Makefile b/arch/arm/boards/pm9263/Makefile
> index eb072c0..47ab803 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boards/pm9263/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/pm9263/Makefile
> @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> obj-y += init.o
> +obj-y += lowlevel.o
> +pbl-y += lowlevel.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/pm9263/lowlevel.c b/arch/arm/boards/pm9263/lowlevel.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b8a8728
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/pm9263/lowlevel.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <init.h>
> +#include <sizes.h>
> +#include <asm/barebox-arm.h>
> +#include <asm/barebox-arm-head.h>
> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
> +#include <mach/board.h>
> +
> +void __naked __bare_init reset(void)
> +{
> + common_reset();
> +
> + at91sam926x_entry(AT91_SDRAM_BASE, SZ_64M);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index 30225fa..f962084 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ config SUPPORT_CALAO_DAB_MMX
> config SUPPORT_CALAO_MOB_TNY_MD2
> bool
>
> +config HAVE_AT91SAM926X_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> + bool
> +
> # ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> if ARCH_AT91RM9200
> @@ -116,6 +119,7 @@ choice
> prompt "AT91RM9200 Board Type"
>
> config MACH_AT91RM9200EK
> + select HAVE_AT91RM9200_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> bool "Atmel AT91RM9200-EK Evaluation Kit"
> help
> Select this if you are using Atmel's AT91RM9200-EK Evaluation Kit.
> @@ -180,8 +184,10 @@ config MACH_AT91SAM9261EK
>
> config MACH_PM9261
> bool "Ronetix PM9261"
> + select HAVE_AT91SAM926X_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> select HAS_DM9000
> select MACH_HAS_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> + select MACH_DO_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> help
> Say y here if you are using the Ronetix PM9261 Board
>
> @@ -258,18 +264,23 @@ choice
> config MACH_AT91SAM9263EK
> bool "Atmel AT91SAM9263-EK"
> select MACH_HAS_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> + select MACH_DO_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> select HAVE_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
> + select HAVE_AT91SAM926X_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> help
> Say y here if you are using Atmel's AT91SAM9263-EK Evaluation board
>
> config MACH_MMCCPU
> bool "Bucyrus MMC-CPU"
> + select HAVE_AT91SAM926X_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> help
> Say y here if you are using the Bucyrus MMC-CPU
>
> config MACH_PM9263
> bool "Ronetix PM9263"
> select MACH_HAS_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> + select MACH_DO_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> + select HAVE_AT91SAM926X_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> help
> Say y here if you are using the Ronetix PM9263 Board
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> index 3ade725..f9cb4f1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
> obj-y += clock.o gpio.o
>
> -lowlevel_init-y = at91sam926x_lowlevel_init.o
> lowlevel_init-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200) = at91rm9200_lowlevel_init.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_DO_LOWLEVEL_INIT) += $(lowlevel_init-y)
>
> pbl-$(CONFIG_MACH_DO_LOWLEVEL_INIT) += $(lowlevel_init-y)
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_AT91SAM926X_LOWLEVEL_INIT) += at91sam926x_lowlevel_init.o
> +pbl-$(CONFIG_HAVE_AT91SAM926X_LOWLEVEL_INIT) += at91sam926x_lowlevel_init.o
> +
> obj-$(CONFIG_AT91SAM9_RESET) += at91sam9_reset.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_AT91SAM9G45_RESET) += at91sam9g45_reset.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_lowlevel_init.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_lowlevel_init.c
> index 0ee0345..a399854 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_lowlevel_init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_lowlevel_init.c
> @@ -34,12 +34,17 @@ static void inline pmc_check_mckrdy(void)
> } while (!(r & AT91_PMC_MCKRDY));
> }
>
> -void __naked __bare_init reset(void)
> +void __naked __bare_init at91sam926x_entry(unsigned long sdram_base,
> + unsigned long sdram_size)
> {
> + uint32_t pc;
> u32 r;
> int i;
>
> - common_reset();
> + pc = get_pc();
> +
> + if (pc < AT91_SDRAM_BASE || pc > AT91_SDRAM_BASE + 0x10000000)
> + goto end;
>
> at91_sys_write(AT91_WDT_MR, CONFIG_SYS_WDTC_WDMR_VAL);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h
> index 670c73d..eb71ed5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h
> @@ -154,4 +154,7 @@ struct at91_spi_platform_data {
> };
>
> void at91_add_device_spi(int spi_id, struct at91_spi_platform_data *pdata);
> +
> +void at91sam926x_entry(unsigned long sdram_base, unsigned long sdram_size);
> +
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-17 21:03 [PATCH] ARM: Make memory known to lowlevel code Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 01/28] ARM: Make malloc available in all initcalls Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 02/28] ARM at91sam926x: provide reset function for boards with lowlevel init Sascha Hauer
2012-10-18 7:26 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2012-10-19 15:30 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 03/28] ARM at91rm9200: " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-18 7:27 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 04/28] ARM: Add new entry point for barebox Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 05/28] ARM i.MX Add functions to get sdram base and size Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 06/28] ARM i.MX boards: switch to barebox_arm_entry Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:12 ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-11-01 19:21 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 07/28] ARM AT91 " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 08/28] ARM i.MXs " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 09/28] ARM OMAP " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 10/28] ARM Samsung " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 11/28] ARM PXA " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 12/28] ARM ep93xx " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 13/28] ARM tegra " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 14/28] ARM nomadik " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 15/28] ARM versatile " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 16/28] ARM netx " Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 17/28] ARM: remove now unused *_LOWLEVEL_INIT Kconfig options Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 18/28] ARM start: remove unused board_init_lowlevel* functions Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 19/28] ARM pbl: setup stack at end of SDRAM Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 20/28] ARM pbl: Call uncompressed binary with arguments Sascha Hauer
2012-10-18 7:29 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-19 15:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-19 16:15 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 21/28] ARM pbl: make MMU functional again Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 22/28] ARM start: pick up memory/boarddata arguments from pbl Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 23/28] ARM start: Add barebox_arm_boarddata function Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 24/28] ARM: Determine base and size of malloc space from SDRAM Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 25/28] ARM pbl: always copy piggydata Sascha Hauer
2012-10-18 7:23 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-19 15:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-19 17:27 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 26/28] ARM i.MX: Use SRAM stack in lowlevel code Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 27/28] generic memory layout: fix deps for [MALLOC|STACK]_BASE Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 21:03 ` [PATCH 28/28] ARM: disable HAVE_CONFIGURABLE_MEMORY_LAYOUT Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121018072656.GB22418@game.jcrosoft.org \
--to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox