* TX53: Not Bootable from next tree
@ 2012-11-05 11:08 Christian Kapeller
2012-11-05 12:52 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kapeller @ 2012-11-05 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Hi,
I've just flashed barebox from the next tree onto a TX53-8030 module,
and have to report, that the board won't boot.
Currently I've tried to run it with MMU off and setting the text-base
to 0x71000000, with no positive results.
I'll do further investigation, but meanwhile does anyone have barebox
running on a TX53 board?
Cheers,
Christian
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: TX53: Not Bootable from next tree
2012-11-05 11:08 TX53: Not Bootable from next tree Christian Kapeller
@ 2012-11-05 12:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-05 13:27 ` Christian Kapeller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2012-11-05 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kapeller; +Cc: barebox
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:08:10PM +0100, Christian Kapeller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just flashed barebox from the next tree onto a TX53-8030 module,
> and have to report, that the board won't boot.
>
> Currently I've tried to run it with MMU off and setting the text-base
> to 0x71000000, with no positive results.
>
> I'll do further investigation, but meanwhile does anyone have barebox
> running on a TX53 board?
I just tested that it works for me as second stage. I can't test 1st
stage atm as I currently have no physical access to the board.
Some guesses: Have you checked the correct the correct board revision in
the config? It's the default, so I assume it's correct.
Are you using the barebox-flash-image link or barebox.bin? You have to
use the former because it's a compressed image.
You might want to disable compressed image support in
General settings ->
memory layout ->
[ ] pre-bootoloader image
And see if that works.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: TX53: Not Bootable from next tree
2012-11-05 12:52 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2012-11-05 13:27 ` Christian Kapeller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kapeller @ 2012-11-05 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox
>> I've just flashed barebox from the next tree onto a TX53-8030 module,
>> and have to report, that the board won't boot.
>>
>> Currently I've tried to run it with MMU off and setting the text-base
>> to 0x71000000, with no positive results.
>>
>> I'll do further investigation, but meanwhile does anyone have barebox
>> running on a TX53 board?
>
> I just tested that it works for me as second stage. I can't test 1st
> stage atm as I currently have no physical access to the board.
Until now I've used bb in a 2nd stage configuration on top of the supplied
Redboot, and it worked without any problem.
Additionally I had CONFIG_MACH_DO_LOW_LEVEL_INIT disabled which skips
another pll setup step, that was already done by Redboot.
> Some guesses: Have you checked the correct the correct board revision in
> the config? It's the default, so I assume it's correct.
Yes, I did check for the correct board revision, and am using the
correct one: CONFIG_TX53_REV_XX30=y
> Are you using the barebox-flash-image link or barebox.bin? You have to
> use the former because it's a compressed image.
I've noticed, that the link target changes depending on build
configuration. So I've flashed the file pointed to by barebox-flash-image.
> You might want to disable compressed image support in
> General settings ->
> memory layout ->
> [ ] pre-bootoloader image
Just tried that, but without changed result.
Currently I am trying to get my PEEDI JTAG probe working with the
board, but until then I stay in the dark.
Cheers,
Christian
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: TX53: Not Bootable from next tree
@ 2012-11-06 13:49 Peter Wippich
2012-11-07 8:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 8:33 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peter Wippich @ 2012-11-06 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Hi,
got the same problem here. Double checked Board Version (8030) and
that I have the right binary (compressed with flash header). After
flashing and reset nothing happens....
Used default config tx53stk5_defconfig.
Swiched back to old u-boot for now.
Regards,
Peter
| Peter Wippich Voice: +49 30 46776411 |
| G&W Instruments GmbH fax: +49 30 46776419 |
| Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, Geb. 12 Email: pewi@gw-instruments.de |
| D-13355 Berlin / Germany |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: TX53: Not Bootable from next tree
2012-11-06 13:49 Peter Wippich
@ 2012-11-07 8:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 8:33 ` Sascha Hauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2012-11-07 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Wippich; +Cc: barebox
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:49:06PM +0100, Peter Wippich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> got the same problem here. Double checked Board Version (8030) and
> that I have the right binary (compressed with flash header). After
> flashing and reset nothing happens....
>
I'll recheck when I'm back in the office next week. I have no idea what
is going wrong atm.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: TX53: Not Bootable from next tree
2012-11-06 13:49 Peter Wippich
2012-11-07 8:04 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2012-11-12 8:33 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 11:22 ` Peter Wippich
2012-11-12 13:02 ` Christian Kapeller
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2012-11-12 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Wippich, g; +Cc: barebox
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:49:06PM +0100, Peter Wippich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> got the same problem here. Double checked Board Version (8030) and
> that I have the right binary (compressed with flash header). After
> flashing and reset nothing happens....
I'm back in the office now and realized that we have the 1011
revision in our remotelab. That at least explains why I can't reproduce
this issue. Unfortunately I can't find the 8030 revision anywhere in the
office, I'll wait for my collegue.
In the meantime, could you try removing the call to
imx53_init_lowlevel() and try booting 2nd stage (from U-Boot or
redboot)?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: TX53: Not Bootable from next tree
2012-11-12 8:33 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2012-11-12 11:22 ` Peter Wippich
2012-11-12 13:02 ` Christian Kapeller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peter Wippich @ 2012-11-12 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox, g
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:49:06PM +0100, Peter Wippich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> got the same problem here. Double checked Board Version (8030) and
>> that I have the right binary (compressed with flash header). After
>> flashing and reset nothing happens....
>
> I'm back in the office now and realized that we have the 1011
> revision in our remotelab. That at least explains why I can't reproduce
> this issue. Unfortunately I can't find the 8030 revision anywhere in the
> office, I'll wait for my collegue.
> In the meantime, could you try removing the call to
> imx53_init_lowlevel() and try booting 2nd stage (from U-Boot or
> redboot)?
>
> Sascha
Hi Sascha,
bad enough my test board is out for some customer tests. I'll try a second
stage boot as soon as it is back.
Best regards,
Peter
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
| Peter Wippich Voice: +49 30 46776411 |
| G&W Instruments GmbH fax: +49 30 46776419 |
| Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, Geb. 12 Email: pewi@gw-instruments.de |
| D-13355 Berlin / Germany |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: TX53: Not Bootable from next tree
2012-11-12 8:33 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 11:22 ` Peter Wippich
@ 2012-11-12 13:02 ` Christian Kapeller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kapeller @ 2012-11-12 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox, g, Peter Wippich
Hi,
> In the meantime, could you try removing the call to
> imx53_init_lowlevel() and try booting 2nd stage (from U-Boot or
> redboot)?
2nd stage booting TX83-8030 from redboot works with and without call to
imx53_init_lowlevel (boards/karo-tx53/lowlevel.c)
I've also looked at the DCD sequence at the beginning of the redboot and
bb (CONFIG_PBL=y) binaries and saw, that what set's them appart is:
flash_header.entry RB: 0x8FFC0000
flash_header.entry BB: 0x71000000
flash_header.boot_data_size = 0x1fd87;
flash_header.boot_data_size = 0x40000;
Barebox has an additional DCD Item compared to redboot:
arch/arm/boards/karo-tx53/dcd-data-xx30.h line 15:
DCD_NAME_XX30[] = {
DCD_WR_CMD(0x21c),
DCD_ITEM(0x53fd4068, 0xffcc0fff),
DCD_ITEM(0x53fd406c, 0x000fffc3),
The DCD_WR_CMD(0x21c) duplicates the the last entries of the
flash_header_section structure:
arch/arm/boards/karo-tx53/flash_header.h line 68:
.dcd.command.tag = DCD_COMMAND_WRITE_TAG,
#ifdef CONFIG_TX53_REV_1011
.dcd.command.length = cpu_to_be16(sizeof(struct imx_dcd_command) +
sizeof(dcd_entry)),
#elif defined(CONFIG_TX53_REV_XX30)
.dcd.command.length = cpu_to_be16(0x21c),
So the DCD_WR_CMD(0x21c) seems to be superfluous.
I've adjusted entry address, the boot_data_size, and removed the
DCD_WR_CMD entry, to match the flash header to that of redboot, and
flashed that. That didn't show any improvement.
Also here the situation is the same with and without imx53_init_lowlevel.
Cheers,
Christian
--
Christian Kapeller
cmotion GmbH
Kriehubergasse 16
1050 Wien / Austria
http://www.cmotion.eu
christian.kapeller@cmotion.eu
Phone: +43 1 789 1096 38
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-12 13:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-05 11:08 TX53: Not Bootable from next tree Christian Kapeller
2012-11-05 12:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-05 13:27 ` Christian Kapeller
2012-11-06 13:49 Peter Wippich
2012-11-07 8:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 8:33 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 11:22 ` Peter Wippich
2012-11-12 13:02 ` Christian Kapeller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox