From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TaMaa-00032y-LP for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:20:22 +0000 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:20:15 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20121119082015.GZ10369@pengutronix.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: are there still issues with building sandbox on x86_64? To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: "U-Boot Version 2 (barebox)" On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 03:27:55PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > perusing the page in the wiki discussing sandbox: > > http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=user:building > > which mentions problems with sandbox on x86_64. i've had no trouble > building and running sandbox under ubuntu on my 64-bit asus laptop. > are there specific known issues? thanks. Not that I know of. It should be fine now. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox