mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: add do_fixup_by_compatible with u32 and string version
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:59:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130218085947.GK1906@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361038719-25530-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 07:18:39PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> ---
>  common/oftree.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/of.h    |    6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/common/oftree.c b/common/oftree.c
> index 6b20cdb..82e5ddd 100644
> --- a/common/oftree.c
> +++ b/common/oftree.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,33 @@ void do_fixup_by_path_u32(struct fdt_header *fdt, const char *path,
>  	do_fixup_by_path(fdt, path, prop, &val, sizeof(val), create);
>  }
>  
> +void do_fixup_by_compatible(struct fdt_header *fdt, const char *compatible,
> +			const char *prop, const void *val, int len, int create)
> +{
> +	int off = -1;
> +
> +	off = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(fdt, -1, compatible);
> +	while (off != -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND) {
> +		if (create || (fdt_get_property(fdt, off, prop, 0) != NULL))
> +			fdt_setprop(fdt, off, prop, val, len);
> +		off = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(fdt, off, compatible);
> +	}
> +}

IMO we shouldn't increase the dependency on libfdt. The fdt format is a
nice storage format, but it sucks for modifying the tree.
I created some patches to get rid of libfdt entirely yesterday. They are
not complete yet, but removing libfdt has some nice effects:

- Smaller binaries
- No more parallel universes of fdt and internal trees. This currently makes the
  devicetree code messy
- I trimmed down the overhead of unflattening/flattening significantly.
  It still adds some overhead to do it, but manipulating the tree is a
  factor of 50 faster which means once you have multiple manipulations
  of the tree it reduces the overhead to a net win.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-18  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-16 18:18 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-02-18  8:59 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2013-02-18 17:44   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-03-04  7:56     ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130218085947.GK1906@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox